People work more productively in teams than individually Teamwork requires cooperation which motivates people much more than individual competition does
Teamwork as a whole can naturally produce an overall greater productivity through the concept of "synergy", where the total of whole is greater than the sum of its individual. But the idea that people work more productively in teams than individually is going to vary between type of teams, the end rewards or motivation for both team and individuals, as well as.
Regarding individuals, some people are born with desire to success , no matter what the situation and condition they are facing. These people evolve into the classic "type A" personality that work enthusiastically because they are driven by internal fire which says they always have to do something, whether as an individual or as a team. Some people are not socially active, for these people their work is more effective when they work individually, because every idea of cooperating with other will limit their effectiveness and efficiency, as they simply don't want to be a part of a team.
Some people are highly motivated by social interaction and desire to work collectively as a team. Obviously these individuals are most productive when they work in a group. Organizational behavioral studies shows that Asian cultures are much more likely to show such collective behavior than the individualistic behavior which is associate with western cultures. We can naturally says that there may be cultural values that can determine whether people are more effective individually or as a part of a group.
Last but not the least, the degree of productivity of a person and a team will also depend upon the organization. Is the group contain equally contributed individuals ? Does the group has an outstanding leader which motivate individuals and team as a whole? Hence a leader can make all the differences whether a person is more effective as an individual or as a part of team. Personality, who can work well together can prove to be more productive as a part of a team or as an individual, and vice versa.
To sum up, measure of productivity depends greatly on individuals themselves. The dilemma facing leaders in all area of life is how to determine the capability of folks to reach ultimate productivity. Whether a person works alone or in a team with others is one of the great challenges that leaders and the managers must face effectively and efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e people are born with desire to success , no matter what the situation and condit...
^^
Line 2, column 568, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tiveness and efficiency, as they simply dont want to be a part of a team. Some peop...
^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'say'
Suggestion: say
...with western cultures. We can naturally says that there may be cultural values that ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have'?
Suggestion: have
...ontributed individuals ? Does the group has an outstanding leader which motivate in...
^^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...tivate individuals and team as a whole? Hence a leader can make all the differences w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03076923077 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14119605587 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502564102564 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9239187558 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.411764706 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420054765302 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133709633705 0.0831039109588 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809910550575 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232727410208 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853231685972 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.