Individual's greatness does not stop by spreading once they become zenith during their career. The statement is given above states, the greatness of individuals can be recognized only by those people who live after them, not by their contemporaries. However, the greatness of individuals not only determined after their demise but also by their peers. The above issue can be evaluated by many examples, which explain how contemporaries recognize the greatness of individuals.
There are many people from different fields in society, which can recognize the greatness of a person and willing to work with them for the betterment of society. Lets consider the political field. For instance, Mahatma Gandhi and Jawahar Lal Nehru. They were contemporaries. They work from the same political party. They appreciate and admire each other for their work. Though Mahatma Gandhi could become prime minister of India, he promoted Jawahar Lal Nehru for the given post. They together fought for the independence of India. Hence the greatness of individuals is decided by their contemporaries.
Another example that can cite my view is, Lets look into the sports field. Sarena Williams and Venus Williams are considered the best players of tennis in the world. Being sisters, they share their weaknesses and strengths together. Additionally, being contemporaries, they equally understand the greatness of each other. Being players, they ere willing to play with each other for their country. Therefore the greatness of individuals can be decided by their contemporaries, but not after their death.
Although, many might think that the greatness of individuals can be decided only after their death, not by their contemporaries. However, unfortunately, some people are recognized only after their demise. It doesn't mean that their peers don't want them to be famous. But as contemporaries, they might not readily recognize their greatness. For example Elvis Presley. He was known as the king of " Rock and Roll". Even now he is still known as the king of " Rock and Roll". His contemporaries said he was the best musician of his time. So, the greatness of a person can be recognized by their contemporaries.
To sum up, the greatness of individuals can be decided not only by people who live after them but also by their contemporaries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ith them for the betterment of society. Lets consider the political field. For insta...
^^^^
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hey work from the same political party. They appreciate and admire each other for th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 533, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...r fought for the independence of India. Hence the greatness of individuals is decided...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...play with each other for their country. Therefore the greatness of individuals can be dec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: much might; a good deal of might
..., but not after their death. Although, many might think that the greatness of individuals...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... recognized only after their demise. It doesnt mean that their peers dont want them to...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...demise. It doesnt mean that their peers dont want them to be famous. But as contempo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27005347594 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01062038642 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451871657754 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 23.0359550562 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6872899722 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.9655172414 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8965517241 23.4991977007 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.27586206897 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514239388928 0.243740707755 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14498772915 0.0831039109588 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178174978536 0.0758088955206 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377733418686 0.150359130593 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189065377499 0.0667264976115 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 48.8420337079 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.2143820225 61% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.