The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities
Political leaders need to possess specific skills to perform their jobs efficiently. However, having specific skills is not commensurate with applying them while attempting to solve a problem. The greatness of a leader is measured by how they tackle challenges and not by their inherent skills.
Challenges in almost all domains are the best ways to exhibit acquired skills. Political leaders have a lot of opportunities to face these challenges and prove their competence or abilities. For example, suppose the Covid-19 cases in the leader's jurisdiction are proliferating. In that case, the measures they take need to be well thought of and calculated to mitigate the virus's spread efficiently. Similarly, strategic meetings can be conducted to discuss their issues to solve discrepancies with a neighboring region. Each of these situations calls for a different but undoubtedly sharp set of skills required to solve any problem precisely.
Further, challenges help showcase a leader's dexterity, but they also help sharpen their skills. Not just limited to politics, solving problems is one of the best ways to refine pre-existing or acquire skills. For instance, a leader may not be versed in tackling farming issues under his leadership in a relatively small region. While attempting to solve a problem, they may seek counsel from board members and talk to their subjects to better understand the scenario. The ability to adapt is crucial for a leader. The famous saying - Experience is the best teacher - conveys the same thought. Thus, good leaders adopt competencies while performing their job to facilitate the task.
Although most skills are tested while a challenge is being handled, this is not always the case. Some problems may assess a particular set of skills, and other tasks may not test these. Concurrently, not all tasks test all the necessary skills a leader must have. Consider, for example, maintaining decorum, conversational skills, eloquence, the ability to inspire, etc. These are some of the countless skills a political leader should embrace. Thus, facing challenges can test many essential skills but may not account for all of them.
Political leaders in these modern times have to encounter numerous daunting challenges and face major impediments while doing so. While having good inherent skills and abilities is beneficial, applying them to solve problems is an essential job of being a leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...mple, suppose the Covid-19 cases in the leaders jurisdiction are proliferating. In that...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... Further, challenges help showcase a leaders dexterity, but they also help sharpen t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... the ability to inspire, etc. These are some of the countless skills a political leader sho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34635416667 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88435990611 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518229166667 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.9933307442 60.3974514979 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.5416666667 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285728404245 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849303889991 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618959944045 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179918162718 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471060218853 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.