A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Civil rights establish and represent the humane nature of the society. Under no condition should one's civil rights be deprived from him. The prompt claims that we should remove the civil rights and the right to benefit from his or her own labor if he or she has knowingly committed a crime by breaking social contracts. I strongly disagree with the claim and argue that even if a person knowingly commits a crime, he is still human and should be treated with the respect and civility that corresponds to us humans.
In most cases, a person who knowingly commits a crime must have an underlying fundamental reason for why he committed the crime. Take a poor worker who stole money from his employer, for instance. The worker, compared to his employer has a lower social standing. He could have had financial problems or maybe one of his close relative is sick and is in desperate need of money to pay his hospital bills. If he does not have the money he could have gone to some bank to borrow money or even could have asked his employer for help. The chances of him getting a loan from the bank is low as the bank also takes into consideration the ability of an individual to repay. In the case that his employer also refused, he is now driven to commit a crime. As a result, he knowingly commits the crime to steal money to pay the hospital bills. If instead the employer had given him money, the worker, perhaps would not have committed the crime. Now, the worker committed the crime to save a life and although that does not justify his crime, he should still not be deprived of his civil rights or the right to benefit from his own work after his time in prison. This example is not constricted to only a poor person. Anyone who is driven to desperate measures because of things which are out of their reach would probably commit a crime.
Perhaps, an example of a self defense murder would be more appropriate for this claim. For instance, let us take. a women who hit her abusive husband and inadvertently caused his death. Her husband could have been hitting her on a daily scale for the past so many years, perhaps. She could have probably reached her limit of tolerance and in an instant decided to push back. The husband could have been surprised by the unusual nature of the wife and could have slipped and hit his head causing a stroke which could have led to his death. She could have run out of the house scared by the husband's revenge on her actions. In this case, the women who was already in a pitiful state is further introduced into the turbulence of murder and law. She is still human and still holds her good side. Perhaps, she would have been good if not for an accidental moment. This does not mean that she should be deprived of her civil rights. She could probably serve her sentence or if she gets a good lawyer who defends her case well, she might be cleared of her blames. If the former happens, she would serve her sentence and come out to live among the society. The law itself is in support of a criminal's civil rights and would allow her to continue to live among the society as long as she does not commit another crime.
In conclusion, a person who knowingly commits a crime and breaks social contract, often times does it in a moment of desperation and should not be deprived of his civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her labor. Doing so would make them consider even more aggressive crimes which would be deleterious to the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | Sumilak | 75 | view |
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10 in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a first time director whose only previous exper 68
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 66
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a 62
- The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate Another advantage is that housing costs in 68
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
... this claim. For instance, let us take. a women who hit her abusive husband and i...
^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
... this claim. For instance, let us take. a women who hit her abusive husband and inadver...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...his claim. For instance, let us take. a women who hit her abusive husband and inadver...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1182, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a criminal' or simply 'criminals'?
Suggestion: a criminal; criminals
...ociety. The law itself is in support of a criminals civil rights and would allow her to con...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 33.0505617978 215% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2852.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 639.0 442.535393258 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46322378717 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02776782673 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2923215975 2.79657885939 82% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.410015649452 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 889.2 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.2456179195 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.125 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.96875 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71875 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 20.0 5.13820224719 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314568872927 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917041723111 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984132627663 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264367175668 0.150359130593 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10886029116 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
... this claim. For instance, let us take. a women who hit her abusive husband and i...
^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
... this claim. For instance, let us take. a women who hit her abusive husband and inadver...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...his claim. For instance, let us take. a women who hit her abusive husband and inadver...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1182, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a criminal' or simply 'criminals'?
Suggestion: a criminal; criminals
...ociety. The law itself is in support of a criminals civil rights and would allow her to con...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 33.0505617978 215% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2852.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 639.0 442.535393258 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46322378717 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02776782673 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2923215975 2.79657885939 82% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.410015649452 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 889.2 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.2456179195 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.125 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.96875 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71875 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 20.0 5.13820224719 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314568872927 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917041723111 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984132627663 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264367175668 0.150359130593 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10886029116 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.