A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
The crux of the topic was that a person who commits crime deliberately should not retain any civil rights or civil benefits for his or her labour. I personally disagree with the statement for the following reasons and I am going to provide some epitome to bolster my stance.
First of all, crime and criminal activities are social-economical problems of our society and to curtail the crime, the law has been implemented. A criminal already had punished for his or actions and over that deprive his right seems overdose and might exacerbate the situation. civil rights are basic human rights and even the government is bound to provide the basic right to the citizens. In spite of deliberately or unknowingly commits, civil rights should not be taken away.
Our law punishes people according to their crime intensity and not all the crimes, even though knowingly done maybe because of the situations. For example, forbidding law can be criminal activity. So, when a person deliberately broke traffic law can be criminal and because of the crime he should not retain any civil rights, or a person who steal foods in hunger also a criminal, another example is a woman murdered someone while protecting herself should be treated as a social outcast. this seems unfeasible and ludicrous. Not all the crime activity trying to harm the base of society, and besides people who had been punished and punished again for the same actions seems unreasonable.
implementing strict law or took away social right cannot solve criminal activity. To completely eradicate the crime we have to understand the social and economic problem of the situation in which the crimes had been committed. Sometimes, after sentenced people try to go back to the normal life but if civil right and benefits had been taking away from them they go towards the same criminal path because he has to survive. Deprive civil rights and benefits does not make our society a happy place, for example, Denmark is the happiest country because every person have their equal basic human rights and that causes less criminal activities.
On the other hand, people might argue that there are crimes which are heinous enough to create as a pariah and civil rights should not be given to them. For example, terrorism and gang wars, they free from jail and commits the same crime again and again. This might be true that in some cases deprive social rights is sound and just but treated every crime and criminal as a social outcast does not sound pragmatic.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say that we must understand the situation and intensity of a crime before treated them also law sentenced punishment according to their crime, outcast the criminals does not solve the problem. We must address the root cause if we want to eradicate the crimes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Civil
...ose and might exacerbate the situation. civil rights are basic human rights and even ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... should be treated as a social outcast. this seems unfeasible and ludicrous. Not all...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Implementing
...r the same actions seems unreasonable. implementing strict law or took away social right ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use if we want to eradicate the crimes.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, so, while, as to, for example, first of all, in some cases, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2337.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88912133891 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51778655525 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456066945607 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8007195681 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.85 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362452590812 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113846636123 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108101078838 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207322738514 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996094495275 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.