: A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Every contigent of people, whether a small village, or a large nation has a constitution by which the are guided. This constitution, previously agreed upon by the people is the set laws which binds them and would often contain punishment to be metted out on individuals who deviate from these laws. Every individual member of this group should have an apt understanding of these laws and their corresponding punishments, and is expected to abide by them. An individual who goes against these laws knowingly has broken the social contract, and should be punished accordingly. However, there are limits to which these punishments should be carried out and under various circumstances, as life is not always black and white. Severity of punishment should not be extreme, rather should commensurate the crime and circumstance, and individauls should definetely not lose their civil rights completely.
While the laws of the land might clearly state the punishments deserving for a particular crime, it should be understood that the circumstances for this crimes are not always similar and as a result should be taken into account. For example, should a mother who stole food to feed her hungry children be punished similar a teenager who stole a phone? While they are both guilty of stealing, the circumstances differ in that the former acted in a feat of neccesity, while the latter acted in a feat of ostentiatiousness. It would be rather extreme for mother who only acted from a place of love for her kids to have undergo a cruel fate such as loss of civil rights and practical slavery.
Also, statistics have shown that most criminals are not likely to be second offenders as most of their crimes were only due to misguidiance in the first place. Upon correction and guidiance which they receive the correctional facilities the number of cases of criminals who turned their life around far surpasses the cases of recedivism. Take former South African president Nelson Mandela for example. He had commited a number of crimes in his youth and was imprisoned, but he managed to turn his life around and led his country to independence. If he had been wriiten of the first time, stripped of all his civil rights and practically enslaved, the world would have been robbed of a great man.
One might argue that every member of society acts in their own best intrests when they commit crimes and their victims also suffer, so therefore there should be no second chances, but the truth is that some of society's laws are extreme and at some point everyone must have broken them. We shoild all look towards each other with com
People should always be given second chances because as humans we are prone to mistakes. Sometimes all it takes is some guididnace to turn even the most recalcitrant teenagers into great adults.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...arge nation has a constitution by which the are guided. This constitution, previously a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e understood that the circumstances for this crimes are not always similar and as a ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 615, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'undergone'.
Suggestion: undergone
...om a place of love for her kids to have undergo a cruel fate such as loss of civil righ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: SO_THEREFORE[1]
Message: Use simply 'so' or 'therefore'.
Suggestion: so; therefore
...t crimes and their victims also suffer, so therefore there should be no second chances, but ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2343.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92226890756 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74641066128 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518907563025 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.16741918 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.166666667 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224763739345 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667607966434 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637718294239 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10608632404 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505105425798 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.