A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
It is clear that the pet food company should conduct a further investigation regarding their recalled pet food to understand if there were other factors that could have made their customers sick.
The ingredients included in the company's pet food may be approved for use but it is not clear how much of each ingredient is allowed or being consumed. There is a possibility that the company exceeded the recommended limit of the approved ingredients and that their customers are overdosing and becoming sick. The pet food company should also research how large of a dose each pet is receiving. If each pet is receiving more than the company's recommended dosage then, while the company may not be liable, they should take action to correct this behavior.
The Pet food company should also conduct a full audit into the processing and manufacturing of their dog food. Although each individual ingredient may be approved for use, there is a possibility that their product has been contaminated at some point before it reached their customers. The company should investigate its health and safety practices and also test the recalled product for contamination.
If, after reviewing the ingredients limits, each customer's food intake and investigating if the product was contaminated, the company has still not produced any findings; then it should do more research on customers who got sick. There is a possibility that the dog food was not the reason these dogs got sick and there is some other unknown phenomenon happening with their customers. The only way to understand this would be to do more research to see if the pet company can find other commonalities among those who got sick.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 58.6224719101 31% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 283.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04946996466 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78435812651 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480565371025 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5273730868 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.909090909 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329870328592 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158087085411 0.0831039109588 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116135252286 0.0758088955206 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245261458962 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736799124722 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.