Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
The foundation of education should rely on logic, not morality. This will produce a more standardized education system and will also result in a more morally balanced society.
The primary issue with a morality based education system is that individual's can have vary degrees of a morale compass. Because of this it is impossible to create an education system that is able to adhere to the morale code of the entire populace. A good example of a morality based education system would be one centered on faith. The obvious conflict here is that there are many different religions and conflicting ideologies in a single community. Using education to satisfy one faith organization will likely upset another. One option could be to let individual institutions select their own unique morale foundation to build their curriculum off of. This will produce a country of fractured knowledge levels and likely produce a higher number of religious fanatics.
The two benefits of a logic based education system is that it can be standardized and scaled, and it will produce a more evenly balanced morale society. It is non-debatable that one plus one equals two. This is a fact that all young children understand and with this knowledge they are all equally prepared for higher education, regardless of where they attend school. A logic based education system produces a populace that have an equal understanding and knowledge level and that system can be scaled to everyone.
The other benefit of a logic based education system is that it does not dictate a singular morale code. This allows the family unit and the individual to make their own decisions based on the their surroundings and the standardized education. If institutions don't teach religion and morality as fact, there will be less fanatics across society.
Its clear that a logic based education system is superior to a morality based system because of its positive effects on society and its ability to be implemented for an entire populace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'varied'.
Suggestion: varied
...ion system is that individuals can have vary degrees of a morale compass. Because of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... have vary degrees of a morale compass. Because of this it is impossible to create an e...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...obvious conflict here is that there are many different religions and conflicting ideologies in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...al to make their own decisions based on the their surroundings and the standardized educa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...standardized education. If institutions dont teach religion and morality as fact, th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun fanatics is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ion and morality as fact, there will be less fanatics across society. Its clear ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 330.0 441.139720559 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09393939394 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79193545435 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472727272727 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 705.55239521 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7291048926 57.8364921388 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8823529412 119.503703932 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 5.70786347227 12% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232573957795 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882734454213 0.0743258471296 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670331658302 0.0701772020484 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15264442414 0.128457276422 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558693966269 0.0628817314937 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.