The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
The conclusion of the argument is too much strong with respect to the amount of information and evidence provided. The declaration of wildlife has a great impact on the extinct and extant animals.
It is not that there are no other sanctuaries which has allowed roads and public to pass on the borders. There are many sanctuaries worldwide which have allowed traffic to pass through them. They are able to control the speed of the traffic so that no animal gets killed by vehicles. Even heavy vehicles are allowed to pass through the sanctuaries with a caution that they have completed the polution and noice control of their bogies.
How did millions of tufted groundhog survived till 2004 when there are humans who can harm them? Only declaring a wildlife century does not do the entire job. There have been many other efforts to preserve the species of importance.
The Neighboring Earstern Carpenteria had a similar sanctuary is vague. In what terms the author is measuring the similarty is not provided in the arugment. It might had happend that the decline of population is due to weather, environmental changes because of global waming, etc. How much population declined is also not mentioned in the arugment.
The repealing of sanctuary status of Neighboring Eastern Carpenteria could also have happened because of some other reasons. The author does not mention about how the a sanctuary is qualified to leave its status.
In conclusion, the arugment is too much strong and cannot be easily derived from the information provided. If all of the above knowledge would have been given, one could be able to decide that the road should be allowed to built or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
.... The author does not mention about how the a sanctuary is qualified to leave its sta...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 111, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rived from the information provided. If all of the above knowledge would have been given, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 138, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...provided. If all of the above knowledge would have been given, one could be able to decide that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in conclusion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 282.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97163120567 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62909245874 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54609929078 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2047208641 60.3974514979 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.4705882353 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58823529412 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0616717255455 0.243740707755 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0184459813999 0.0831039109588 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221402159891 0.0758088955206 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0314334312494 0.150359130593 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278113361198 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.