Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Few days back, Hillary Clinton made FBI her reason for her loss in the presedential election. She quoted that CBI investigation in using her private email server would have left her on the losing side. We still dont know wheather Hillary Clinton would be prosecuted in the private server case or not but one thing is sure that this scandal has hampered her image and definately her popularity for becoming the next president. Had been case being revealed later we may have our first U.S. women president. But what followed next is all history.
Many a times scandal are quite irrelavant. They are followed in news for no reason. Media industry maybe highlighting that scandal for their increased TRP or hoping that this news may lead them to market dominator. But they are showing them because poeple are following them. A person should take a minute rest and introspect himself that whether this scandal which is being shown deserve my attention. He may end up turning the news channel.
Although some scandal seems genuine and deserve people attention. But most of the time, these scandals die out before they can create an impact for people good. People follow news for some days and there has been lot of debate regarding some scandal. But then a bigger news comes up and all the debate for the earlier scandal goes to vain. The government may have not implemented a single step which would prevented the earlier scandal.
Many a times a scandal can be false. Much of the news are exagerated by the media. They are moreover a conjecture to a false news. News channel draw a conclusion without any concrete and authetic proof. The media should wait and make sure their news is correct before broadcasting it live on television.
Yes, scandals have sometimes focused our atttention to some problems which may have never got our attention or get a desired attention which it's deserve.
But many a times scandal comes out to be irrelevant or false. It's depend on people to follow those scandal, debate on them for the better good or dump them as conjecture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e left her on the losing side. We still dont know wheather Hillary Clinton would be ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
...followed next is all history. Many a times scandal are quite irrelavant. They are ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
... some scandal seems genuine and deserve people attention. But most of the time, these ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 6, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
... prevented the earlier scandal. Many a times a scandal can be false. Much of the new...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'false news'.
Suggestion: false news
...edia. They are moreover a conjecture to a false news. News channel draw a conclusion without...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lives'?
Suggestion: lives
... news is correct before broadcasting it live on television. Yes, scandals have so...
^^^^
Line 10, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
...ttention which its deserve. But many a times scandal comes out to be irrelevant or f...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 93, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this scandal' or 'those scandals'?
Suggestion: this scandal; those scandals
...r false. Its depend on people to follow those scandal, debate on them for the better good or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81741573034 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43548721356 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0057933759 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.4583333333 118.986275619 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.20833333333 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142741000529 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427698663456 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045440964914 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870896824832 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603284613315 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.