Nowadays, with the advancement of technology, scandals can be founded easily. Some people believes that, it is better to have scandals in a society and this would help to find the root of problems. However, I believe that scandal poses much more pros than cons and in what followed the most discernible reasons are drawn.
First and foremost, people of a society believe their government trust to them. By the time scandal occurs, they gradually lose their confidence and this would poses many drawbacks to their country, especially monetary matter. For example, last year, Iranian government proclaimed that one of the most scandalous project was accomplished in the city of Tehran( capital of Iran). Accordingly, more than 3000 individuals were captured and more than 100 ran away. So, people tried to change their idea that neither the banks nor other related banking company, are the safe place for their assets and the withdrawn most of their properties. Therefore, the rate of theft increased since the amount of money in individuals' houses increased too. This example clearly shows that if scandal happens, it will causes irredeemable results.
Second, scandal, especially in large scale, would hurt country popularity and the country would find it difficult to have relationships even with its allies. Indeed, other countries think that since the number of criminal increases they would control all the country economy. Take a recent scandal in Venezuela as an example. Last two year, more than 5000 people were accused in monetary scandal in which they lost more than 10000 piece of gold coins of country resources. So, immediately its allies tried to cut reciprocal relationships since Venezuela didn’t have any gold and the value of money had fallen down.
However, some other feature of this issue can be discussed since the source of problem is electronically trackable. In this regard, the government can enact new fiscal or tax policy on the places which the number of scandals are high. Hence, some minor scandals would help to find the source of problem and prohibits problems with much more impact.
All in all, as the above-mentioned examples have illustrated, mainly, scandals cause irredeemable problems, albeit, in minor cases it may help the whole society. Nonetheless, to see as a whole, the idea is not convincing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'pose'
Suggestion: pose
...ly lose their confidence and this would poses many drawbacks to their country, especi...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 797, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
... shows that if scandal happens, it will causes irredeemable results. Second, scandal,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'piece' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pieces'.
Suggestion: pieces
...ndal in which they lost more than 10000 piece of gold coins of country resources. So,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18684210526 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6998242992 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.576690125 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.55 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100928274778 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329466045609 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031433362998 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0614039641346 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392777443639 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.