Major cities of a country are one of the most important part of a country's culture and also tradition. Yearly, most of the governmental funds are assigned to major cities for the convenience of its citizen such as bus transportation, beauty of the city, green and fresh environment and etc. Some believe that governments should also allocate financial support to big cities in order to ensure the culture and tradition of a country. Nonetheless, I believe that for cultural and traditional progress the money should be assigned mostly to rural and in what follows the most discernible reasons are drawn.
First and foremost, people in rural are indulged in traditional lifestyle but, the residents of cities prefer modern lifestyle. In this regard, the money assigned to cities for cultural and traditional purposes can be called a waste. People who live in cities prefer pizza and fast food but those in rural eat natural food such and vegetable base food which if a traditional eating habit. Also, the residents of cities, use bus and car as transportation vehicles, however, those in rural use horses and donkeys which seems more traditional. Hence, the money should be assigned to rural since citizen of the cities have different and modern lifestyle which is contradictory to culture and tradition.
Another reason which deserve some word to mentions is that, the governments should subsidize those parts in which culture and tradition come from. Indeed, as the main source of culture and tradition, rural, with enormous natural resources should record their own traditions before becoming extinct. The cities' residents are not fully aware of traditions and cultures which plain people commonly engaged with. Based on the governmental report, the rural part of Iran, suffers from illiterate people. This would hurt writing and saving tradition and if the governments assign more amount of money to enhance the knowledge that would yield more traditional record. Consequently, the money should provide a firm foundation for people to be able to record their own culture, not to recruit another writer which may include unauthorized event as impersonal predisposition.
However, it is important to be considered that investment in cities for cultural and traditional purposes would increase the number of tourist. This would promote new job such traditional hotel, decrease unemployment rate, import new currencies and finally enhance the culture of whole society since they would keep in contact with different people. Nevertheless, the tourists are reluctance to stay in rural parts which seems unsafe and a little bit scary. Hence, the governments would provide new monetary sources by imposing and injecting the money on the major cities.
All in all, as the above-mentioned examples have illustrated, mostly, it is better idea to invest money on rural but not major cities to invest on tradition and customs. Nonetheless, there are incontrovertible benefits of investment in major cities such as new job opportunities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...f the city, green and fresh environment and etc. Some believe that governments should al...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...food such and vegetable base food which if a traditional eating habit. Also, the r...
^^
Line 4, column 440, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...in rural parts which seems unsafe and a little bit scary. Hence, the governments would pro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2557.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32708333333 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88978009424 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470833333333 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7115476778 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.761904762 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240476014726 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849464844988 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064338585384 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146024644612 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465991674522 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.