Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In modern times, scandals and corruptions have become banal. People in authority are so adept in hiding their flaws, wrong doings. There two reasons for this situation either public is already busy in their daily life problems, do not find time to see what is happening in this world and other side is common people do not have much authority to question people in the power.The conclusion that scandals help to concentrate on a problem a speaker could not, is convincing and i strongly agree to this statement.
To begin with, Scandals happen when people with a designation forget their responsibility and become greedy for money. We think scandals happens in places where there is large flow of money and it is not true, because, everything where we compel to compromise with our moral is corruption. For instance, when we are late for work we tend to break traffic rules and we find it wrong only when a police officers catches us and we try to bribe him to reduce the amount of fine.
Secondly, the people only have power to choice the ruling party, rest it up to the president to make his decisions. We don't have authority to ask him about all the investments he has taken during his tenure. For example, Recently the opposition party has raised many questions regarding the Rafael deal that has been signed by Indian and France government. There where many questions about the credibility and ruling government has paid lot more than the actual price.
Lastly, public are so busy in their daily life problems and don't get much time to dedicate for the corruption going around and accepted it as a sad truth.
In sum up, people should be more active and given enough power to question people in authority and we raise should start raising our voice against scandals and punished harshly. So that people should not repeat it. People should be educated enough to realize that the money the government is investing is their own money, that we paid in the form of taxes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...thority to question people in the power.The conclusion that scandals help to concen...
^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the president to make his decisions. We dont have authority to ask him about all the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o busy in their daily life problems and dont get much time to dedicate for the corru...
^^^^
Line 6, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... against scandals and punished harshly. So that people should not repeat it. People sho...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73333333333 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43396466592 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547826086957 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.5843795565 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0671694662573 0.243740707755 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237363224427 0.0831039109588 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291812744733 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0355039886742 0.150359130593 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229668184113 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.