Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scandals are interesting most usually controversial event which gets people's attention more easily. History dectates that, past scandals have revealed many bitter truths about reality. Like common wealth games 2008 scandal revealed money laundering and corruption in politics.
Most recent scandal is death of Sushant Singh Rajput(SSR), a bollywood actor who committed suicide. This scandal has got very high TRP and wide publicity for over 3 months. The more they went on investigating, more possibilities were suspected. This brought alleged connections of famous ruling politicians, drug racket among famous bollywood celebrities like issues in media focus. Hence, I agree with author claiming that scandals do bring attention to problems in a way that no one will ever could. Moreover, scandals also sheds light on behind the screen bitter truths which public are unaware of.
Recently, Mr. Trump's former secretary have blamed him of corruption and electoral manipulation. This scandal attracted media's attention very easily and trending since a month. This even provoked some vigilantes to dig deeper and some shocking truths came in light. It also provided topic of rebuttal to Trump's rivals as they got valid points to raise questions against him. Hence it is agreed that, scandals are useful to become aware of problems that no one ever could suspect.
But, if you see the other side of the coin, all above examples can also affect society or youth in a way no one ever could thought of. After SSR scandal there was dramatic increase in youth suicide rates. Also, many youngsters inferred that, it is ok if you do drugs as celebrities do why cant we? as they idolizes bollywood famous celebrities.
Scandals of corruption in politics implied that, bribe can make your work done no matter how bad or good your proposal is. Adding to that, many local surveys showed, there was increase in bribe offering from the public itself to get their work done from government officials.
Recent Mr. Trump's allegations showed world that, effective politicians are often corrupt from inside and they dont really care about society's betterment conevrsely, they are more concerned about self image.
Ultimately, I agree scandals are useful to shed light on behind the screen truths which are kept secretive from public. Additionally, it makes rare possibilities conscious . But, wholistically, scandals hampers societal health as well as attitude. Conclusively, scandals bring no good to society as a whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 375, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... points to raise questions against him. Hence it is agreed that, scandals are useful ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 124, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'think'
Suggestion: think
...ety or youth in a way no one ever could thought of. After SSR scandal there was dramati...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in a way no one ever could thought of. After SSR scandal there was dramatic increase...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 290, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...k if you do drugs as celebrities do why cant we? as they idolizes bollywood famous c...
^^^^
Line 8, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...do drugs as celebrities do why cant we? as they idolizes bollywood famous celebrit...
^^
Line 8, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...do drugs as celebrities do why cant we? as they idolizes bollywood famous celebrit...
^^
Line 8, column 307, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'idolize'
Suggestion: idolize
... as celebrities do why cant we? as they idolizes bollywood famous celebrities. Scandal...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 326, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...why cant we? as they idolizes bollywood famous celebrities. Scandals of corruption in politics i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... are often corrupt from inside and they dont really care about societys betterment c...
^^^^
Line 12, column 172, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y, it makes rare possibilities conscious . But, wholistically, scandals hampers so...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, really, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31909547739 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67726426062 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613065326633 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9490441692 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.68 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.92 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224034971668 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587086190983 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643881202541 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100759711603 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455777636094 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.