Science is meaningless without religion.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Science is one of the most important field of the domain which has facilitated the livelihood of people around the world. There have been a wide range of applications in which science has played a significant role in making the lives of the people easier. Given the statement that Science is meaningless without religion is not completely true and needs an introspection. Connecting such a prominent field of application with religion is absurd.
Firstly, innovations have been developing over the years in the mankind to facilitate the lives of all the beings in the community. For example, Edison has made a tremendous discovery of finding the electricity, without which today's world would be nothing but vacuous. Though Edison might have followed some religion and revered a particular deity, it has no way in connection to his intelligence in finding out newer ways or perceiving the objects. This contradicts the given statement that Science is related to the religion.
Secondly, if we consider the pace in which today's innovations are being carried out, these are all not being conducted only by a particular set of community or religion, though there might be people from various sectors, backgrounds, origins, nationality, creed, religion etc. Consider the case of a rocket launch which has been carried out very recently from India. The crew of members who made it happen would be originating from various countries to make the launch successful. Thus it is not a valid statement to say that religion plays a role in developing of scientific discoveries.
Though the above two examples mentioned above display the fact that religion does not play a prominent role in the advancement of science, there are a very few evidences which prove that it is true. In the older ages, where there is lack of basic education to most of the people, education would be pursued by only a few sector of people who belong to a certain religion. At that times, if and only if there are intelligent people in such a sector of people, scientific discoveries would emerge. Nonetheless, given the fact that there are a mere amount of people who consider religion before science, which does not hold true completely in today's contemporary world.
Thus, in conclusion, though one might see that the religion would play some role in a particular field of study, when perceived the same statement in a broader sense, it looks very vague. Thus, one must stick to the fact that religion is not something which defines a person or a field of study, but it is the determination and talent which allows the revolutionaries around the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ountries to make the launch successful. Thus it is not a valid statement to say that...
^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun sector seems to be countable; consider using: 'few sectors'.
Suggestion: few sectors
...e, education would be pursued by only a few sector of people who belong to a certain relig...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 547, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...s, given the fact that there are a mere amount of people who consider religion before ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83697597953 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451025056948 0.4932671777 91% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8898787331 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.944444444 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146908059015 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559712436427 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346747483475 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917978490722 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281741846625 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.