As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious
Knowledge eliminates the ignorance among the mankind. There are wide range of topics around the world which people try to perceive and understand the concepts and their origins. However, as we penetrate profoundly to get a clear picture about a topic, there will be a state where one feels the complexity of the issue is too deeper to penetrate further. Thus, I agree with the notion that the amount of complexity increases tantamount to the amount of knowledge gained by a person.
To begin with, as we try to understand the deeper concepts of a theory, diversification occurs; the topic will itself diverge into number of subsets. To illustrate, consider the concept of “Blackholes” which were recently explored by the scientists of NASA. During the past times, when there was no tinge of information about their formation and occurrence, the scientists have not all believed about its existence and exploration. However, recently when two Japanese scientists Kysfu and Yeku acquired the knowledge about the formation and the phenomenon of Blackholes, there were innumerable doubts about its origin and establishments. Hence, if a particular concept is unknown, one does not pay attention to it. But, as one acquires more perception, the profoundness also increases gradually.
A theory was prevalent during the 15th century that most of the people believed earth was the center of the universe with the Sun and the starts revolving around it. However, when there are some technological breakthroughs during the 18th century by the scientists Ptolemy and Copernicus, one could perceive through the telescope and come to a conclusion that the previously held belief was a fallacy. But, the breakthrough did not end there. Even today, there are many unknown myths regarding the formation and the arrangement of the universe. In some cases, one can even prove that earth is the center with certain limitations. This leads to labyrinth of problems to the scientific community.
In contrast, one has to acquire the basic knowledge and concepts about a particular theory. There will be a certain threshold of knowledge which is necessary to understand the further concepts. For instance, a computer program about the occurrence of Fibonacci series eludes a student who pursues his Masters in Physics. However, if he had understood the basic concepts and elements of programming, the same program might be too facile. Thus, in this case, as a person understands by digging deeper into the certain concepts, the amount of complexity wanes significantly.
In conclusion, one has to agree with the notion that knowledge is tantamount to an ocean and it becomes increasingly profound as one tries to understand it. As new theories come out into the scientific community, the number of queries burgeons rapidly and the seemingly naïve topic becomes a labyrinth one. However, if a person who is not well informed about certain concepts tries to acquire more knowledge, he would eventually gain much clearer picture about the concept rather than fail to grasp its fundamentals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, regarding, so, thus, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2595.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25303643725 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01982296741 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487854251012 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 810.9 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5062951945 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926616192634 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250883441012 0.0831039109588 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461779432569 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0540169876239 0.150359130593 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407915516832 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.