A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a

Essay topics:

A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

A set of laws and rules are stipulated by any government in order to facilitate the lives of the people. Society must follow them irrespective of how stringent the rules are so as to lead a peaceful life. If there is a breach to certain set of protocols which were put forth, there will be chaos and disturbance in the society. Thus, I agree with the opinion that if a person commits a crime knowingly, he must be punished severely and should not be allowed to retain his civil rights.

To begin with, a crime which has been committed will have a drastic effect on the society. For instance, consider bribery, which was a crime according to the set of laws put forth in the constitution. If a person is taking bribes, he his generating the income which will not be taxable and due to this, there will be loss of revenue to the government to run smoothly. Thus, a person involved in this crime will be suspended from his job and fined for committing the crime. If no such rules were proposed, more people addict to such crimes which would become profound and would be tough to handle.

Secondly, consider the case of drunken drive accidents. According to the statistics from the Traffic Department in Hyderabad in 2010, about 75% of the accidents occurring on the roads are drunken drive cases. Hence, a person who has committed this crime would get his driving license banned forever and must pay a gargantuan sum of money as fine. As these protocols were set up, in the span of 5 years, in 2015, there was a decrease in the number of accidents by 78% according to a study. Thus, whenever such harsh rules were established, the people fear to commit the crime, as there would be a threat to their rights and thus such policies benefit the society.

Conversely, there would be some times where people need to commit a crime knowingly as the situation demands. To support this case, consider a person who needs to donate his blood to a person who was injured badly and is getting treated in the hospital. During this time, the donor can skip a red light in order to save a life. Though skipping a red light is a crime according to the rules, the completion of the mission is much more demanding than the rules. In this case, there must not be any breach to the rights of the person who has committed the crime knowingly.

To conclude, there are certain crimes committed by the people for their own benefit. During these times, such crimes must be condemned strongly and the person must not be allowed to retain his or her rights. However, there will be certain situations where a person commits a crime knowingly in order to save a life or such decent causes. In this case, proper investigation must be made and instead of belittling the crime, the person must be lauded.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...spective of how stringent the rules are so as to lead a peaceful life. If there is a bre...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for instance, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 500.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.564 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47567687714 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5979892746 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.2173913043 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7391304348 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08695652174 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223946251751 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747217302135 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057631884434 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138195446754 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219680298943 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.