Science is meaningless without religion.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The crux of the topic is that science could not be defined without the basis of religion. I completely disagree with the statement for the following reasons and I am going to provide some examples to bolster my stance.
First of all, science is a vast area to be generalize and has large purview, from daily science to astronomical to zoology and it is hard to marginalize the field of science. The purpose of science is to find meaning and cause of an unknown incident in our diurnal life with the help of logic and facts, which religion can not define. Science and religion had a long adverse history and whenever religion tried to control science and innovations, the effect was abysmal. Scientists were killed over beliefs and over religion. For example, Gallio was killed when his discoveries were against the idea of church and the popes. During world war II, the scientists were killed by Hitler, who were Jews.
Science and religion were never complementing each other, it was always hindering the progression of science. For example, when Nasa first launch moon exploration, religious people againts the idea because that was against their beliefs. Even in modern days, in many countries studing of young girls was obtrude because it is against the idea of religion and people were killed in the name of religion. Besides, whenever science experiments was the puppet of religious leaders the effect was deleterious.
Many people argued that science and religion someway relatable and science could be complete with the idea of religion and science could be used as to resolve the daily discrepicenies of relegion. They are someway may be true, but from history there was no concrete evidence that science and religion can be confluence to eachother. People might also argued that science can not solve and answer eveything but that is why we need more experiment on the field and more facts to define fantasies. Peole in the premordial day believed that mobile phone is a fantacy but today it is real.
At the epilogue of the topic I would say that science and religion has no relation to eachother and the main idea of science is to question everything where the notion of religion has a dogmatic view it hinders our free thinking and limits our exploration. When people belief in something without logic and facts it is called stupidity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'obtruded'.
Suggestion: obtruded
...ny countries studing of young girls was obtrude because it is against the idea of relig...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... science is to question everything where the notion of religion has a dogmatic vi...
^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...logic and facts it is called stupidity.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, so, as to, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9022556391 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58246567504 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496240601504 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7214303749 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12431414471 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436918119677 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321171602072 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821843948839 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323256681208 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.