No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
The crux of the topic is that one who seeks profusion knowledge in any field of studies also should consider knowledge from the outside of his expertise. I personally agree with the argument for the following reasons and going to provide examples to bolster my stance.
First of all, any subjects do not stand alone and every subject connected to each other. For example, if someone chooses physics as his or her expertise field, then he must know mathematics and vice-versa. Any field of study connected to each other. A civil engineer now must know a programming language, not because of extra knowledge but now, he has to create his own design and stay advanced in this competitive market. Even though in earlier era computer science and languages considered as outside the field of civil engineering.
Knowledge from outside the expertise increase the diversity of knowledge and proliferate the perception about subjects. Each profession of a field is not disparate from each other. For example, in the field of engineering each profession concomitant to each other. An architect can rubric an edifice but a structural engineer's job is to foment the structure, BUt without mechanical and electrical engineering it does not possible to complete the structure marvel. Without the permission of chemical composition of a construction product and without chemical engineering material cannot be used. so, in case of diverse knowledge, one must have overall experience from outside his subjects.
People might argue that outside field not always necessary. A doctor's profession does not need an intensive history lesson and an engineer might not need medical knowledge. But, a doctor can not cure without knowing the history of a pathogen and if a normal person interested in medicine, I think that is great for him, at least he knew what he is consuming. Also, if a person is health conscious, that might benefit him.
The epilogue of the topic, since diversified knowledge can change a person perception I would suggest that everyone should consider experience outside expertise knowledge, even if it is to some extent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: STAND_ALONE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'standalone'?
Suggestion: standalone
...nce. First of all, any subjects do not stand alone and every subject connected to each oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'engineer'?
Suggestion: engineer
... can rubric an edifice but a structural engineers job is to foment the structure, BUt wit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...al engineering material cannot be used. so, in case of diverse knowledge, one must...
^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...t outside field not always necessary. A doctors profession does not need an intensive h...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, as to, at least, for example, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1652173913 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85017014567 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4284711597 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272074343477 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892408430648 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793589559477 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148998448106 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460985119104 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.