No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and
experience from outside that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting
your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true
and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The speaker asserts that no field of study can advance dramatically unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from other fields. I am in favor of this statement since it holds water in many fields.
The statement raises valid points in the field of humanities and social science. The communication and incorporation among the subjects like history and literature are pervasive. For example, if people want to study on Asian American, the historian can seek for some invaluable archive of this group. And the Asian American literature not only helps to analyze the current living condition of this group, it is also conducive to the research on how certain historical events affect these people. Never can we neglect the contribution made by anthropologists that they can study on this group by investigation and interviews. Hence, such complex study cannot be accomplished without the cooperation and communication among several fields.
It can also hold for the Engineering. The projects in this filed are always finished by a myriad of experts from different fields. For example, when the government considers whether they should establish a bridge in the city, the socialists need to collect the ideas from the citizens regarding whether they want such a new bridge. And if it is to be built, the knowledge from the mathematics can be beneficial to the calculation of the exact data of the proper width, length,and height of this bridge. It also needs the help from the theory of mechanics. Only when all of these aforementioned fields conspire to finish such a project can it be realized.
Even though in some fields which seem totally irrelevant, such as the Arts and the science, sometimes they can be combined to form a new subject to explore in the unknown area and improve the standard of living. For example, a subject named industrial design, which combines the knowledge of material science and engineering as well as art design, can be used to improve the appearance and functions of the products. Also, a subject called neuroscience, which incorporates the professional knowledge and experience from the physiology and biology area as well as mathematical modeling, can better study on nerve to understand certain behavior and mental problems of people.
Overall, under the scenarios mentioned before, no field of study is capable of acquiring progress dramatically unless it incorporate knowledge and experience from other fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 476, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...e exact data of the proper width, length,and height of this bridge. It also needs th...
^^^^
Line 17, column 122, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'incorporates'?
Suggestion: incorporates
...quiring progress dramatically unless it incorporate knowledge and experience from other fie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, regarding, so, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2582278481 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96758755039 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511392405063 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2005906209 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.388888889 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258375479406 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853001830915 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760401696718 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169485950581 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573073395517 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.