No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit

Essay topics:

No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Any field, may it be science, arts, sociology or any other, it is crucial that we are able to incorporate knowledge and experience from any other field of study. Sharing of knowledge from one field to another always helps us get a better perspective of the world outside our field, and we can use the advancements from other fields to generate new expertise in our fields. To support this claim, I would present some important points with examples that would support the statement.

Firstly, if we are able to incorporate knowledge from any other field of study, it gives us an advantage of extra knowledge from some other field, and we can also interrelate subjects from one field of study with other, and draw meaningful conclusions. For example, if there is a knowledge sharing between history and the current trends in technology, it would make us knowledgeable about how things have actually evolved over time, and generate a link between the human cycle. Hence, it is necessary that knowledge is transferred from one field to the other.

Additionally, if we are able to get ability from one field into the another, there is sharing of knowledge about processes, workflows and how things are tackled in that field. Also, a person new in our field would have some out of the box thoughts than the ones we have by working in that field. This is the reason many corporate offices have started hiring people from different domains, as it gives a new perspective and throws light on how things are processed in other domains.

For any field of study to advance, there are multiple factors responsible. The impact of other fields is one of the major factors responsible for advancement. To exemplify, what if Ola Cabs and Uber Cabs never adopted technology, and just have been in the automobile business? Would it have been possible for them to succeed? For them to triumph, they had to incorporate knowledge from the computer sciences field, and it turned out to be the unique reason for their success in the automobiles services industry. From the above example, we can clearly understand the importance of incorporating knowledge from any other field of study.

As there are many positive advantages by knowledge and expertise sharing, all the fields should be up to date with the latest trends and advancements in other fields as well. There are multiple ways by which the transmission can happen, including research conferences, field visits, etc. Considering all the factors mentioned above, we can rightly conclude that there should be incorporation of knowledge between fields, as it bolsters the advancements in any field.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... support the statement. Firstly, if we are able to incorporate knowledge fro...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, well, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01133786848 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76444112024 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446712018141 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.0 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4446671116 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.777777778 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304204605301 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11643765937 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059842677622 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198461431234 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408116289354 0.0667264976115 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.