Science is meaningless without religion.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Religion is a set of beliefs, while science is knowledge about the universe we live and its workings. It is this knowledge that is gained and transferred to the successors of every human generation. It is stated in the prompt that Science does not exist without the existence of religion. In my opinion, i strongly disagree that, by stating three reasons.
Science is different from religion, at least in the aspect that, science has evolved throughout the existence of mankind, but religion has stayed the same since its inception. For instance, Initially it was believed that the earth was flat, but later it was because of a great greek scholar that we came to know, that earth, the cradle of life, is not flat, instead it is spherical in shape. Scientists are always skeptical, and they did not stop there. Later they found that earth was not perfectly round, also it is wider in the equatorial region than in the poles, which meant that earth is not exactly spherical in shape too. Here, religion had nothing to do with science. Religious believes stay the same, whereas science is constantly evolving.
Science does not accept anything blindly. Every new finding or invention is scrutinised to the highest possible level. In religion, we accept practices, where, some has meaning and usefulness, others are not understood completely, but we still tend to do them as we do not question its usefulness. For example, every drug that is invented, goes through tremendous screening and testing, before it is made available to the common public. Science requires validation. Whereas in many religiouis believes, people do whatever the saints or priests recommned them to do, just because it is written in some old scripture. It might had its uses in the olden days, but does it still hold water for this era. That is never questioned.
It is possible that someone would say, that religion came into inception even before the termn science was coined, and science was born from religion itself. Just because apes came into existence before humans did, does that mean they are better than humans? Science and religion are two opposite poles, created by us humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: spherical
...dle of life, is not flat, instead it is spherical in shape. Scientists are always skeptical, and t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: spherical
..., which meant that earth is not exactly spherical in shape too. Here, religion had nothing to do w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccept practices, where, some has meaning and usefulness, others are not understoo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, whereas, while, at least, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98076923077 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54264883463 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546703296703 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.6783060856 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38095238095 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0928985393044 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0292068971568 0.0831039109588 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253137927188 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0590238554123 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145610824262 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.