Self-Knowledge start first by rejecting the familiar
By definition, familiarity is what is common around us; it may be a common belief, a common happening, a common lifestyle and so on. Some would argue that self knowledge does not has to be provoked as the result of denying what is familiar. Some other would state that without a rejection of the familiar, self knowledge would never come into play. Giving a careful examination to both views, I strongly believe that what leads to a personal knowledge or new belief first start by gainsaying the pedestrian knowledge.
Henry Ford, the founder of Ford car produced the first set of moveable cars. Those who argue that it is not neccessary the rejection of the familiar that prompted self-knowledge would say Henry ford did not condemn the use of leg to walk before the creation of car. But these is clear that if he did not reject transportation with leg-the famiar occurrence, he would not have thought of developing another means. Critically, the familiar has not been seen has the best way to beliave things would happen that it why to make it better, the first step is to reject that the only possible way to transit is by leg, then start working on a better way to transit.
Tesla, the founder of alternating current rejected the pedestrian idea of using direct current and developed alternating current. It is obvious that it had to reject the use of direct current being what should be used to power the community then came up with alternating current. This started by fighting the familiat intuition of the familiar-dirrent current whick later led him to starting an experiment to discover alternating current. The idea of the familiar was first fought to bring into existence the new idea.
However, it may be said by some that researchers does not neccessarily has to reject the known ideas-the familiar, before setting up a team to research and propound a new theory. All they want is to build on the familiar one and make things better. But, examiing this critically it would have been that they had resolved in their mind that the current theory does give them the best output they want then it has to be rejected before looking forward to proposed a new theory. There is a saying that the end point a thing reveals the reason behind its start-if the familar is no longer use after the discovery of the new idea then it means that, at onset the familiar has been rejected.
In conclusion, the inception of a self-knowledge is the rejection of the familiar because it is when something does not thrills that an alternative has to be developed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: have
...ould argue that self knowledge does not has to be provoked as the result of denying...
^^^
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ould argue that self knowledge does not has to be provoked as the result of denying...
^^^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'thrill'
Suggestion: thrill
...r because it is when something does not thrills that an alternative has to be developed...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 447.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74720357942 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68753377841 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489932885906 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1556056198 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.823529412 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2941176471 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88235294118 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396296733308 0.243740707755 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128614730799 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809728900242 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23523790232 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077924908843 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.8420337079 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.