Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents
I think that education need be for all students, being they with any talent or not. Since have children that have facility to learn and others not. Hence, I don’t agree with the sentence that society should indentify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to devolp their talents, because education need be for all.
First, since educaton is for all, every children can have the same oportunity. However all people there are differents facilities, like someone prefer math others history and other biologic science, and when the children is separated or have mor attention is not good because can make other childrens fell inferior. I’ve been reading about learnig and pscologist said that when the teatcher are teaching need treat all studens equal, because when don’t do that can ental many problems in students. For exemple, when I was in elementary school I had difficult to learning lenguage, and my friend to learning math, the school made a lot supplementary activites for helps everbody, without anyone.
Second, rich people can have favor on this question, due to chance that the children have, like good schools. Private school is good because have less studens per class and more time. For Exemple, this can be observed in the university, the majory of students have been studed in particular school.This is for me not good, since that have more public school than private, implying that people need be treat semilary. Therefore, stay evident that who have money have more chance and better school.
Third, the ability of children is differents, and the investment in talents need be for all students. For instance, there are many schools that have competitions and activities to encorage the students to emprove your ability, and I think it is a good ideia, since that envolve differents sort of talents. Like on higt school, there are competition of chemistry, biology, literature and others. Thus, this activity make good for students.
In conclusion, I don’t agree completely with this argument, since that if say that need invest more in children that have spacial talent. Therefore, I belive that all children need be same oportunity since that education is forr all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... children can have the same oportunity. However all people there are differents facilit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'prefers'.
Suggestion: prefers
...are differents facilities, like someone prefer math others history and other biologic ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... schools. Private school is good because have less studens per class and more tim...
^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...s have been studed in particular school.This is for me not good, since that have mor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in particular, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14092140921 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55182978544 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520325203252 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.197090557 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.588235294 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27388008737 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982797998642 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123274428539 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169964316555 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139708666849 0.0667264976115 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.