Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
There are children out there who have talents that cannot be tapped into due to limited or lack of resources. The recommendation to provide training to children who have special talents is a plausible one. But, before this recommendation can be evaluated, I would like to clarify the terminology used.
How can one determine special talent? When thinking of special talents, one may typically start thinking of Einstein due to his intelligence. There are other fields in which one could be talented in such as the arts and sports. It depends on how well the piece is played, the song is sung, or how many points were scored. When it comes to cognitive function, an IQ test would be sufficient in determining outstanding from mediocre. However, in doing so, it brings up another question. What determines the threshold between special and ordinary? As special talents can be considered subjective, for the purpose of this essay, I define special talents as better than the average population.
If this is the case, then I mostly agree with the recommendation that society should provide training for such individuals to develop their talents, so that they can become the best individual they can be. In some cases, those in low socioeconomic read may not have the resources they need to expand on their talents. Hence, intervention from society can help bolster the potential for that child. But, instead of forcing children to train, it should be done voluntarily. What one is good at and what one enjoys is can be two different things. For example, a child from a family of athletes discovered their love for the arts during after school activities.
Nonetheless, providing training for children who do enjoy their talents can lead to stress, dissuading them from continuing. Parents play a large role in controlling what their child does, since they are in charge of their child’s well-being. Although their intent is pure, the pressure they can put on their child during the trainings can stress the child out and cause them to dislike the very thing they once enjoyed. Therefore, training needs to be done in moderation, keeping in mind to go at the pace of the child. Otherwise, such talent can prove to be the bane of the child’s existence.
As society caters to the children with special talents, it can unknowingly affect the children who are not “special”. The goal of society is to focus on the well-being of the overall population; it may be counterproductive to hone in a niche of the population. It could cause a dearth of resources to the general population. Consequently, training those with special talents should not be prioritized overall those with ordinary talents.
In summation, I am mostly in agreement with the recommendation. However the training for the specially talented children should be provided but not enforced to ensure the child is freely able to develop in the way they choose. The education should also not take away from those who are not “special” to ensure society is still keeping the best in mind for its future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 65, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...y in agreement with the recommendation. However the training for the specially talented...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2569.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 515.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98834951456 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86677575728 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477669902913 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 779.4 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7711048485 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5862068966 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7586206897 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55172413793 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387740836495 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109342935889 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100831910809 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225929003919 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474381233883 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.