Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The argument states that society should only help in the conservation of species which are on the verge of extinction if it is a result of human activity and not otherwise.I agree with the above statement because of the reasons and logical arguments discussed in the consequent paragraphs.
Firstly, if you consider the factors that lead to extinction of a species it may be divided into two broad categories. The extinction can be because of natural adaptation or human interference with natural habitat. if it is because of natural adaptation and the species not being able to adapt over generations it is better not to disturb the natures order. For example, imagine if big reptiles never went extinct, it would have been impossible for many life forms to evolve in wetland environments as they would have constantly fallen prey to such reptiles. As a result the current biodiversity could have been non-existent. Also, according to the famous theory of evolution, “Survival of the fittest”, mother nature itself has evolutionary reasons to make some species extinct. On the other hand if the extinction of species happens due to man made conditions it is causing loss to the ecosystem which may have consequences on the food chain.
In another scenario consider a species that is domesticated by humans and forcefully reproduced to prevent them from extinction. this may cause the gene pool of the next generations to shrink, risking low resistance among the population of species to withstand natural disasters. For example, years of selective breeding of dogs and cats have led to various health issues among the current population, reducing life expectancy and pushing them towards the edge of extinction in near future. The impact is not only related to animal species but to plants too. years of selective breeding by humans for agriculture has made so many grains and fruits less resistant to pests, increasing the likelihood of extinction.
Thirdly, consider the extinct species of parasites and bacteria that went extinct due to natural selection. Had those still been in existence because of human conservation it could have led to pandemic and outbreak of plagues. Besides, we can not ignore the valuable learning derived due to the evolution process and studying the species undergoing natural selection. Scientists now can simulate the process that led to extinction of some species, learning valuable insight on natural intelligence. Had this species never gone extinct we would have not seen many scientific breakthroughs in various sectors derived from such research.
To conclude, it's better to let the process of evolution decide which species should thrive on the earth rather than humans deciding it. it only looks ideal in the screenplay to have a place like Jurassic park rather than humans being really able to control it and create a tragic end for ourselves like depicted in the movie.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...ult of human activity and not otherwise.I agree with the above statement because ...
^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the consequent paragraphs. Firstly, if you consider the factors tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...uman interference with natural habitat. if it is because of natural adaptation and...
^^
Line 6, column 604, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...onstantly fallen prey to such reptiles. As a result the current biodiversity could...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have consequences on the food chain. In another scenario consider a species t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 173, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...oduced to prevent them from extinction. this may cause the gene pool of the next gen...
^^^^
Line 8, column 603, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Years
...ed to animal species but to plants too. years of selective breeding by humans for agr...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easing the likelihood of extinction. Thirdly, consider the extinct species of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sectors derived from such research. To conclude, its better to let the proce...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, really, so, still, third, thirdly, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2468.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20675105485 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82382212749 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502109704641 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5006060569 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.4 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240689328073 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742591808396 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484805146228 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143287693409 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515345840334 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.