Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
With the pollution brought by human activities, many species are on the verge of extinction or have already died out. Therefore, the author claims that our society should take some actions to protect the endangered species from dying out only when the potential extinction is the result of human activities. However, it is not realistic to save all the vanishing creatures.
Admittedly, it is difficult to define the influences human activities have on the endangered species. Our earth is replete with hundreds of thousands of species, and most of them are closely interwoven with each other. Some human behaviours which can cause severe outcomes for specific species are normally overlooked by human themselves. For example, the over use of modern vehicles is often recognised as a cause leading to air pollution, which could affect the living conditions of some birds. However, such a human activity is also a major source of the overwhelming noise in our society, which has an impact on the lifespan of some small creatures, as they cannot tolerate the noise. Therefore, as human are not able to draw an accurate evaluation about the effect they have on species, a more comprehensive protection plan should be made to not only involve the species directly affected by human but also the species which are previously ignored.
However, saving all the endangered species will certainly require a huge amount of funds, which may disrupt the economy of our society. For example, many countries around the world have invested a lot, which includes both human resources and money, in scientific researches so as to preserve the lives of many species. In doing this, there’re only a small proportion of creatures can be saved. Therefore, if the target is to prevent all species from dying, the resources the society invest are beyond our imagination and certainly will cause the economic recession.
In addition, the extinction of some species is the wish of nature and we don’t have the right to interfere with it. For example, dinosaurs had once dominated the earth, but they vanished in millions of years ago due to multiple reason, such as dramatic climate change. It is obvious that the extinction of dinosaurs doesn’t have any influence on us, because at that time, we humans didn't even exist. Moreover, thanks to the extinction of dinosaurs, we have the chance to become dominate on earth. Therefore, we should respect the process of natural selection, as it may even benefit the well being of human.
In sum, since preventing all species from extinction requires a lot of investments and some of the extinction process is the will of nature, it is no need for human being to protect them all. Instead, we should focus on preserving the species which may cause a huge loss of human.
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstance of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishme 73
- The following appeared in an article in a health–and–fitness magazine:"Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Saluda, 59
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing."During the past year, Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on-the-job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Exper 66
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 58
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the comp 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO
Message: Use simply 'to'
...ces and money, in scientific researches so as to preserve the lives of many species. In ...
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
... on us, because at that time, we humans didnt even exist. Moreover, thanks to the ext...
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE
Message: Simply use 'some'.
...ction requires a lot of investments and some of the extinction process is the will of natur...
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.218045112782 0.240241500013 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.154135338346 0.157235817809 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0733082706767 0.0880659088768 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0657894736842 0.0497285424764 132% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0432330827068 0.0444667217837 97% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124060150376 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0394736842105 0.0406280797675 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73586551585 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0244360902256 0.030933414821 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00375939849624 0.0016655270985 226% => OK
Determiners: 0.118421052632 0.0997080785238 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0263157894737 0.0249443105267 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.015037593985 0.0148568991511 101% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2809.0 2732.02544248 103% => OK
No of words: 466.0 452.878318584 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02789699571 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375536480687 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291845493562 0.280924506359 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.214592274678 0.200843997647 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.139484978541 0.132149295362 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73586551585 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 219.290929204 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50643776824 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 58.5056610459 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.3 23.380412469 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1782789004 59.4972553346 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.45 141.124799967 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 23.380412469 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.674092028746 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 52.4845493562 51.4728631049 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.45 1.64882698954 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.548159903683 0.391690518653 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109844803732 0.123202303941 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0638267191466 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.570086666439 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140635395877 0.149214159877 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244807907446 0.161403998019 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945622227072 0.0892212321368 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.486410277396 0.385218514788 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0496763144591 0.0692045440612 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.414700816587 0.275328986314 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415511142941 0.0653680567796 64% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.