Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take.

The species on the edge of extinction should be carefully protected by human-beings, because we have the ablity to make such protection. While someone like will asserted that we should only focus on the endagered species which the human activities brought about their potential extinction. In this point, I don't agree with this view fundamentally, because no matter what caused their ongoing extinction, we as humans, the most powerful living species in the world, are responsive to save them. This saving is also helping us to some extent, in that this animal diversity will protect the Earth ecosystem, which recycling in a certain way as we cannot figure out clearly. Another range that we cannot define is whether the reason of making certain species to the edge of extinction is anthropogenic. I will adress my view in three point.

To begin with, we have the ability to protect the endangered species, that our resposiblity to protect them.Duo to the development of scientific technology especially in Biological area, we have been discerning and learning living species for thousands of years from dinasours to little bugs. We acknowledged their habitat even the gene arragement. With this degree, we are impowered to protect them , including the species living on the edge of extinction.

What's more, To prevent those species from perishing is to protect ourselves as human-beinigs. The Earth is a comprehensive system that the natural evironment and living species will have the cogent influence to it, if there are some species absent forever, maybe the system will be harmed by some chain reaction caused by the absentism. With the absence of Trees on the up of the Yellow River in China, the lower region of the river suffered from the river damage annualy. So we need to protect them for protecting the integrity of our ecosystem.

Another reason is that as we cannot figure out which species's potential extinction caused by us, we should take more care of any endangered species, Here we discussed the neccesity of every species that could infuence the system, what we should do now is to protect them all no matter what cause their potential extinction.

In conclusion, it is not a choice of which to save between the two group of endangered species,on the othe hand , it is our atittude toward these species which we should protect them even if the reason of potential extinction is not anthropogenic. Because preventing them from extinction is make our human-being's safety as we have only one Earth.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ave the ablity to make such protection. While someone like will asserted that we sho...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...make such protection. While someone like will asserted that we should only focus ...
^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'assert'
Suggestion: assert
...ch protection. While someone like will asserted that we should only focus on the endage...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... potential extinction. In this point, I dont agree with this view fundamentally, bec...
^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Duo
..., that our resposiblity to protect them.Duo to the development of scientific techno...
^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to live'.
Suggestion: to live
...a, we have been discerning and learning living species for thousands of years from din...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...degree, we are impowered to protect them , including the species living on the edg...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...es living on the edge of extinction. Whats more, To prevent those species from per...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , on
...ween the two group of endangered species,on the othe hand , it is our atittude towa...
^^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...p of endangered species,on the othe hand , it is our atittude toward these species...
^^
Line 9, column 249, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ential extinction is not anthropogenic. Because preventing them from extinction is make...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05023923445 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80598142297 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483253588517 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.8725190464 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.9375 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209980753484 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835267408058 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571602587598 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13792914144 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055847310509 0.0667264976115 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.