Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The question if successful leaders in different fields should be more competitive or more collaborative is an intricate one. Some firmly believe to be a successful leader; one should be highly competitive. However, in order to be successful a leader must be willing to cooperate with others because the views of others can bring solutions not thought of before and too much power can lead to corruption.
First, it is beneficial for leaders to consider the perspectives of other members of their team. Certain aspects of a conflict or situation can be unintentionally ignored by one but if they are willing to work in collaboration with others, another might be able to catch the missing piece of a puzzle. Imagine a patient that is brought into the emergency department because they are experiencing pain in their arm. The physician is not constantly present in one patients’ room to observe the patient. So, if this specific patient is speaking with slurred speech, droopy smile and is unable to raise their left arm and leg, any medical personnel is able to relay this information to the attending physician. This would help the doctor diagnose the stroke the patient is experiencing or has already experienced which is causing the pain in their arm. Doctors in any practice work in junction with departmental staff to ensure the patient’s safety, accurate diagnosis and treatment. Working together as a team is highly advantageous for the doctor but as well as the patient.
Furthermore, an excess of power giving to an individual can lead to corruption. Consider President Kim Jong Un of South Korea. The government of South Korea is based upon dictatorship run by Un. In this practice, the opinion of the people of South Korea holds no value or consideration in any decision made for the country, instead all decisions are made by the president without additional input from others. Social media, television and the internet are censored and filtered to only show content that the government approves of. In other words, the population does not have an accurate representation of any event occurring in the world and superficial information about what is searched. Their president is worshipped and anyone who speaks against him is charged with crime. It can be seen that Un is a highly competitive individual, which has led him to abuse the power bestowed upon him. Competitive leaders can partake in corrupt practices which does not necessarily take into account the wellbeing of others.
Finally, some may argue that leaders should have their own decision-making skills, which would allow them to be a leader in the first place. For example, a captain of a football team should be able to make decisions for their team to lead the team to success. Although it is true that the captain will make big decisions for the team, the team will still work together to accomplish a common goal. These individuals will practice their plays consistently and play together on the field, predicting the move of their teammates to win the game. So, even though decisions are being made by the leader, the group is still working together to reach their goal.
Though believing successful leaders should be competitive has valid reasons, these points do not outweigh the opposing side. Therefore, leaders should be willing to work with others in order to be successful.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-24 | Technoblade | 70 | view |
2023-04-09 | nimagm | 83 | view |
2023-04-09 | nimagm | 79 | view |
2021-11-22 | allang9501 | 50 | view |
2021-10-27 | Lucas13 | 33 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of Bargain Brand Cereals One year ago we introduced our first product Bargain Brand breakfast cereal Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top selling cereal companies Alth 68
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
- Nature s Way a chain of stores selling health food and other health related products is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville The store should prove to be very successful Nature s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas where re 66
- Benton City residents have adopted healthier lifestyles A recent survey of city residents shows that the eating habits of city residents conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago During those ten years loca 48
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, as well as, in other words, it is true, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2819.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 560.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03392857143 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.8645985582 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84949366698 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491071428571 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 867.6 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.812783877 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.423076923 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80769230769 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359998894485 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988755397183 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111250333795 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239811945522 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146513949665 0.0667264976115 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.