Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the
societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of
corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
In the statement provided above are provided two different views about the responsibility of corporations. In particular, the former argues that they should care more about the general welfare of their societies, while the latter affirms that they have just to worry about members’ economic business.
As far as I am concerned, I tend to mostly agree with the first perspective, as an exclusive focus on actual economy could bring to several future defeats. In this essay I am going to explain widely my vision.
First of all, as I have already mentioned, it is fundamental to operate not only with the conscience of the present, but also keeping an eye warned on the future. To put it in another way: if corporations have as only objective the richness of the companies involved, the system would work just for a short time. As a matter of fact, every member would want to become even richer and, furthermore, when economic targets promised are not reached, they would complain.
In addition, it is important to keep in mind the historical aim of corporation, that has always been the coordination of the personal interests of involved companies. In particular, associations’ duty has been, since the origins, to keep in shape relationships among societies working in the same field. For this reason, it can be hard imagining a corporation whose primary aim is to make money.
On the other side of the argument, the economy of the society should not be totally ignored since, if several administrators see mutual improvements gained with cooperation, they will be more likely to continue leaning on one another.
In conclusion, I am entirely convinced that even it is deeply important for corporation to help their members to collaborate, the economic side of the argument should not be left in a part, but it should be used as a way to make cooperation even stronger.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97151898734 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96642234225 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1912123872 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.916666667 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.21951772744 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199374909611 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608365970566 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431357765905 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844568974103 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443180936163 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.