Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within- the law, is to make as much money as possible.
The argument presents opinion of two groups of people one with the belief that the only motive for any corporations is money driven and another set of belief is to have initiatives towards environment and societies as well. Though the sustainability of any corporations depend on the amount of profit it makes and in this process it is already thinking of many people of the society by creating job opportunities. But it cannot completely neglect the environmental and societal issues. Without having complaint with the environmental and societal rules any company with the money making tendency will do more harm than good and will leave a permanent mark of damage in the long run which is not at all acceptable.
The inception of any company start with the assessment of the need of the society. The basic structure of profit and loss of any company started by generating supply to meet the demands of the society in loads of manner. Even if we try to neglect the idea of society from the corporations we cannot because it starts from the need of the people of the society. Corporations make money by feeding the needs of the people with its product and in the process make profit for itself. Company might start its business by its money driven tendency and it will go on as long profit comes in otherwise there is no need for running the show and taking up space and resources in every aspect if it cant give anything back tot he society or itself. So monetary benefit is a must to take into account while running a business. But this tendency impair society's peace and and environmental ecology then the corporations is not taking the full picture into account and soon will surely fall apart.
In some cases there might be some trade off between money and environment for greater good. For example, a company making any useful product such as leather products from animal skin and the factory leaves harmful by-products in the environment which call for attention. To address this problem either the company needs to stop making the products and the customers looses its desired products and many people looses jobs as well. But continuing the production for the long time will leave harmful effect on the society, and neither of the extreme situations are expected. The middle ground of introducing to process the by-products and leave less harmful wastes in the environment y sacrificing some profit form the company for processing the by-products will lead tot he sustainability of both the corporation and the environment.
To sum up we can say that any corporations must be driven by profit but by remaining fully complacent with the environmental and societal laws to ensure the its sustainability. It is not at all either this or that condition, proper strategic planning and insights are able to give any corporation its desired result of profit and doing good for the society. In some cases as mentioned trade offs for greater good can bring balance both in corporations and in society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ace and resources in every aspect if it cant give anything back tot he society or it...
^^^^
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ace and resources in every aspect if it cant give anything back tot he society or it...
^^^^
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: TOT_HE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to the'?
Suggestion: to the
...ry aspect if it cant give anything back tot he society or itself. So monetary benefit ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 764, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...ety or itself. So monetary benefit is a must to take into account while running a busin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 856, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...But this tendency impair societys peace and and environmental ecology then the corporat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 709, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...e environment y sacrificing some profit form the company for processing the by-produ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 767, Rule ID: TOT_HE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to the'?
Suggestion: to the
...or processing the by-products will lead tot he sustainability of both the corporation ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...vironmental and societal laws to ensure the its sustainability. It is not at all either...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, well, while, for example, such as, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2498.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8693957115 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74548515012 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440545808967 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 796.5 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6069208693 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.473684211 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.10526315789 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154012683127 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562712722659 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432391976282 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106162788584 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244501925561 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.