A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
The contention assert the idea of teaching students same national curriculum until they enter college. I concede with the idea of giving all the students a fair chance and level playing ground for all student who are interested or have knack in a field. However, it should be taken into account that the field of interest and subject to explore for students are in plural here.
Firstly the arguments here presents the idea of making all students study the same national curriculum for passing high school till they enter college. But making all the students study the same thing can result in killing a talent of studenst which are excluded in the national curriculum, the most common is the art, which is often opted out from almost every national curriculum after a standard class of three or four. What if a student is talented in that particular arena only, ostensibly his potential will be imputed with the subject included in the curriculum and the neglect will create self- consciousness making the child loose his self-esteem and confidence and in no time we will find him destroyed before even reaching the college. The very cliche example of failure of a fish when judged on the criteira of being able to climb elucidate the problem with this argument very well.
The second most important thing is that every raw talent needs nourishment and futher information, practice and training make the talent worth showing to the world. There are of course several exectional cases out there standing for there to show that talents always get show cased in way one or another. Though I am not a privy here to say the number of exceptional cases seems really less in number compared to the possible candidate of talent, not included as a subject, that can be produced thorugh proper care only. The exceptional cases do not also suffice the need for people in the subject that are not valued. Besides the struggle that any student had to go through to make themselves understand their potential to their parents, guardian or peer group could have been channelized developing their knack more if we could indentify earlier.
It is very important for all the students to have basic knowledge about the subject, information we need to deal with everyday. That is, science, economics, math, history, geography knowledge are very important for every student irrespective of their true talent is very imporatant to have. But the following the same curriculum strictly for measuring every student might not give a good yield in the future. Rather school should be the place where students can identify their intellect and learn how to use it in the future for betterment of themselves, their family, soceity and overall huamnity. There are several example in the history for exceptional leader who underwent trouble to make themselves acceptable in the society and now they are celebrated, we do not want our students to face that strugg
In sum, it can be said that different students have different sort of interest and tapping the right potential requires a field where they can explore and learn more about themselves and develop accordingly. Students must have knowledge of the basic education in all field and follow the general curriculum but to make them inexorable in their potential requires building a repertoire in their area of interests which can be different for different student.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
The contention assert the idea of teaching students same nati...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...te self- consciousness making the child loose his self-esteem and confidence and in n...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
...umber of exceptional cases seems really less in number compared to the possible candidate of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...bject, information we need to deal with everyday. That is, science, economics, math, his...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 410, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ht not give a good yield in the future. Rather school should be the place where studen...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 610, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun example seems to be countable; consider using: 'several examples'.
Suggestion: several examples
...soceity and overall huamnity. There are several example in the history for exceptional leader w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, so, well, of course, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2837.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 568.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99471830986 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57842606468 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487676056338 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 889.2 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.229504182 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.611111111 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5555555556 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266312460817 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976804683416 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120067024755 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164944518084 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108548275181 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.