News stories on TV and newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?
In maximum stories covered by TV, newspapers or any other media they tend to attach some relevant pictures. This pictures give us a glimpse about the about the event. Many people consider this pictures to be more effective than the articles written. In my opinion, pictures is very important to help us visualize the situation but they are not alternative to words.
Firstly, pictures can be misrepresented in many cases. A written document along with a photograph or art will make sure the ordinary people do not misunderstand the situation. For instance, a picture of an intense situation like a helicopter firing from the sky. Without any background story no one will understand if the helicopter targeting some terrorist shell or an innocent people a target village.
Secondly, reading any piece of articles gives a lot of associated information to readers. Like an article describing an extinction of a rare bird also includes relevant information of its origin, current situation and birds facing similar fate. Articles or voices narrated in newspaper or TV shows respectively are also used later in other research work as well.
Nevertheless we cannot opt out the importance of pictures as it make a vivid impression of the articles in front of the reader. Besides pictures are stores in human memory more than a written summary.
In sum, it can be said that although picture is not an alternative to writings but its association with any written piece make the content more comprehensible.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'about the'.
Suggestion: about the
...ictures This pictures give us a glimpse about the about the event Many people consider this picture...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l or an innocent people a target village Secondly reading any piece of articles g...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed later in other research work as well Nevertheless we cannot opt out the impor...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...ater in other research work as well Nevertheless we cannot opt out the importance of pic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...human memory more than a written summary In sum it can be said that although pict...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in many cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02834008097 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89119287037 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587044534413 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 247.0 20.2975951904 1217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1242.0 106.682146367 1164% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 247.0 20.7667163134 1189% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 124.0 7.06120827912 1756% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290477861413 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.290477861413 0.084324248473 344% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15847911799 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139689513303 0.056905535591 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 125.8 13.0946893788 961% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -187.69 50.2224549098 -374% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 100.8 11.3001002004 892% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.37 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.92 8.58950901804 232% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 100.8 10.1190380762 996% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 101.0 10.7795591182 937% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'about the'.
Suggestion: about the
...ictures This pictures give us a glimpse about the about the event Many people consider this picture...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l or an innocent people a target village Secondly reading any piece of articles g...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed later in other research work as well Nevertheless we cannot opt out the impor...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...ater in other research work as well Nevertheless we cannot opt out the importance of pic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...human memory more than a written summary In sum it can be said that although pict...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in many cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02834008097 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89119287037 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587044534413 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 247.0 20.2975951904 1217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1242.0 106.682146367 1164% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 247.0 20.7667163134 1189% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 124.0 7.06120827912 1756% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290477861413 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.290477861413 0.084324248473 344% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15847911799 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139689513303 0.056905535591 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 125.8 13.0946893788 961% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -187.69 50.2224549098 -374% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 100.8 11.3001002004 892% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.37 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.92 8.58950901804 232% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 100.8 10.1190380762 996% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 101.0 10.7795591182 937% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.