Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well- being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
When industrialization was first blossoming in European nations, most of the corporations and institutions being created had a sole purpose: the advancement of mankind to unprecedented levels. With a couple of centuries under our belt, most companies have diversified, and now offer a range of products, as well as services. The prompt suggests that these corporations can serve to either promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate, or simply be focussed on making as much money as possible, while sticking within the confines of law. In my opinion, I mostly agree with the idea that any corporation that seeks to progress has the economic and moral responsibility to look out for the society in which it function, and thus contribute towards it betterment and advancement. However, I do concede that even while serving society, there is no immorality associated with institutions that try to make profits off their businesses. I will be outlining two major reasons for my opinion.
First of all, the primary motive of any corporation is to provide a good or service that can be consumed by members of the society. It is highly unlikely for people to buy something when they know it would be useless to them, and hence companies do need to focus on customer satisfaction. For example, a fruit-seller won’t make big profits if he sells rotten apples. These may cost him lesser, but no one would be willing to purchase them. Another example would be that of a law firm, which can never churn out any profits if the lawyers are not adept at defending their clients. By caring about the society, and trying to protect the innocent from being sentenced or punished, the firm doesn’t only benefit the person on trial, but also gains a good reputation for itself. This would encourage other clients to seek their services, thus boosting their acclaim, while also helping in ameliorating the society in which they operate. Thus, there is a symbiotic relationship between a company’s profits and its commitment to the welfare of society, for one can not thrive without the existence of another.
Secondly, a healthy environment adds to the finanical as well as aesthetic image of the corporation. For instance, studies suggest that a number of millennials look out for the ambience, facilities and services that a company provides for them, before taking up a job there. By uping the ante and caring about the safety and mental health of their workers, the corporation would gain loyal employees, who are likely to be more productive. This example illustrates how efforts to preserve and amend the environment and facilities can be prescient for the company’s future growth and progress.
Of course, it is understandable that any corporation would need money in order to stay on top of its activities, pay its employees, and expand themselves further. However, seeking financial stability doesn’t necessarily mean having to compromise on the quality of environment, or damaging and misleading the society to gain profits. Money can be one of the objectives, but it is impossible to maintain a steady earning if one doesn’t provide for the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 742, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'functions'?
Suggestion: functions
...to look out for the society in which it function, and thus contribute towards it betterm...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, of course, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2673.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09142857143 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97090593694 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 834.3 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2243643638 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95238095238 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221761365473 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617834179642 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580086210716 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12975450837 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631757218132 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.