Since time antediluvian, art has hegemony over shaping people's belief, imagination and understanding of life. Art truly explores what it means to be a human being, for example: having emotions, compassions and the purpose of our life on this planet. Art through various mediums provides hope that "everything is going to be alright", furthermore, it mirrors the society's perspective over various subjects. Thus, art is an integral part of our society and government should definitely provide necessary support to ensure that allows art to flourish specially those forms of art which has been moribund because of various known/unknown reasons.
Nation subsidize can help sustain certain art forms. Let's look first at Hindi movie industry popularly known as Bollywood. This industry makes around 2000 movies+ per year. Every year and then the industry produces patriotic movies which government subsidize by removing the 28% of entertainment tax. Now because of slashed ticket price, a large section of audience gets to watch these movies which in return allows movie makers to revive this category.
Most of the private investors are primary concerned with making quick money. The private investors promotes only certain popular forms. Their avarice is well known and has caused to shoot up the price of tickets in theatres. The most blatant example in this case are Indian cinema halls. Around 2007-08, the price of single screen theatres were sold at 25-50 INR, which is now being sold about 250-500+ INR from 2015-19. While there are genuine price increase due to inflation but those price do not reconcile with the humongous price increase of tickets in theatres. That being so, certainly the government investment can normalize the ticket price and allow this form to become more affordable to wide audience.
One may on the other hand, question the integrity of this novel position and argue that government funding will invite bureaucratic interest and can act as a deterrent of all such forms of art, which criticizes government policies or personnel. In my opinion, Such actions can happen without government funding, since most of the censorship bodies are governed by nation government, therefore, such restrictions can be applied without government investments in art hence this argument stands weak and cannot be used as a ground to avert government funding in arts.
Conclusively, it can be said that the government subsidizing art is essentials in today's era. It is even more crucial to those art forms which are indigenous as well as other forms in which private investment has plummeted in past decades. The contrasting view which is legitimate nevertheless cannot be stopped by avoiding the government fund in arts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ize can help sustain certain art forms. Lets look first at Hindi movie industry popu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'promote'.
Suggestion: promote
...king quick money. The private investors promotes only certain popular forms. Their avari...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 715, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecome more affordable to wide audience. One may on the other hand, question the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30892448513 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78836872219 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581235697941 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4159592725 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.476190476 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8095238095 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52380952381 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346386878969 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925069130759 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957415500823 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200916534129 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118731734082 0.0667264976115 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.