Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Art is basically something that is created with imagination and passion which in turn expresses important ideas or feelings. Some common examples of Art are painting, dancing, music, etc. All these activities are the result of the passion possessed by the individual which results in creation of great piece of work. Some people believe that government funding in arts is necessary in order to flourish and be available to all people while others think that, this may affect the integrity of the art. In my opinion, government funding in arts is more beneficial than harmful to art.
Firstly, art is something which cannot be practiced and earned, it is something which comes from natural talent. Art does not distinguish between poor and rich, there are few underprivileged people who have talent but do not have proper platform or the money to showcase their talent. In this case, government funding in form of money or a platform can help these people to display their talent in front of pool of people. There are various examples where an individual cannot posses their talent due to lack of support and funding. If art can earn these people money to live then they will also possess it and do what they are passionate about. For example, I knew a teenager who played guitar extremely well but due to his poor financial condition he had to take a different path and gradually stopped playing guitar over the period of time. In such cases, if the government could fund these people in the form of either money or proper platform then the nation will be full of passionate working people.
Secondly, funding of art also brings economic benefits to the nation. As if these pieces of arts are displayed properly will attract more people and hence will result in economic benefit to the nation. For example, travellers all around the world visit France to see the famous Mona Lisa painting. As France Government has showcases it well many people visit France just to see the famous painting. Another example is of famous Turkish folk dances, Turkish government has taken efforts to organize shows in order to display its fork dance to the travellers.
Furthermore, on the contrary funding has its own limitation, requirements, and demands. In many cases, the arts which are beneficial and famous get more funding and support rather than other arts, which hampers the art culture of the nation. Government should take care that they support all works of art equally so in future there will an environment where any form of art can be chosen as a way of living.
In conclusion, I feel that preserving and promoting art is very important. The government should corroborate individuals to pursue their passion and flourish in society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the integrity of the art. In my opinion, government funding in arts is more benef...
^^
Line 3, column 829, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...adually stopped playing guitar over the period of time. In such cases, if the government could...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e to see the famous Mona Lisa painting. As France Government has showcases it well...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in many cases, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92656587473 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56751589202 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488120950324 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.949101406 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.681818182 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0454545455 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 5.21951772744 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453830058163 0.243740707755 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131805569657 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130036545309 0.0758088955206 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261907307041 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133973552525 0.0667264976115 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.