Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely alligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The word art can be defined as the way of expressing an individual’s opinion more vividly in a creative way. Dancing, painting, singing, drawing all these can be considered as the various forms of arts. The government funding arts can lead to various consequences which can be advantageous as well as disadvantageous.
Firstly, it is the art pursued by the people in a society defines the culture of that society however, there might be cases where a person is forced to stop pursuing an art as their career due to lack of resources or money, in such cases government funding arts can be advantageous as it gives them a chance to continue their career in their respective field of arts, moreover it can also help in creating awareness among people about the importance of arts in a society, which indirectly contributes for the development of arts.
The disadvantages of the government funding for arts also play a major role, if the government is inefficient in funding for arts then it might cause a huge risk for people pursuing their career in their respective fields of arts and also there might be a chance that people start giving less importance to arts which in turn leads to the downfall of the arts in the society thus indirectly effecting the development of the society. What is a society without its arts? The answer to that question can be considered as a society without its culture, which is being monitored by robots rather than the people living in that society.
By considering the above points it can be said that as long as the government is efficient then the government funding for arts can be advantageous however, it is up-to the people of the society to continue in keeping the arts alive even if the government turns out to be inefficient.
it is the arts pursued by the people of a society which define the development of society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a creative way" with adverb for "creative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... individual's opinion more vividly in a creative way. Dancing, painting, singing, drawing al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nes the culture of that society however, there might be cases where a person is f...
^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...nment turns out to be inefficient. it is the arts pursued by the people of a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 325.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79692307692 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8754006667 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 215.323595506 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412307692308 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 162.186297392 60.3974514979 269% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.222222222 118.986275619 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.1111111111 23.4991977007 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 5.21951772744 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403705919537 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203642245288 0.0831039109588 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940258225296 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271938335818 0.150359130593 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545885320114 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 14.1392134831 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 48.8420337079 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.