Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Government have responsibility for providing financial support and allocating budget to different field of society. Without boaster of government any field couldn’t grow properly. Funding of government might in the various different form. Art is major factor or field of any society .Some government believes that the growth of art through the help of funding may have positive effect and can brings positive changes towards society. Art may be of different types such as sports, music industry, cinema, artistic work such as painting etc. Such field have major role in transforming society from one age to another age with their artistic creation and awareness. Government funding might have positive as well as negative role in the development and proliferation of any culture. Some may views funding as negative impact on growth of art and some believes and see negative consequences on it. thus, with analyzing different point f view, I have moderate disagreement on the thoughts of author. In other words, My views regarding funding of government regarding art for their grow and flourish maybe unnecessary and impart negative impact rather doing positive impact.
There are various forms of culture which requires funding as well as public support for their growth and flourish. however, some art requires only public participation for their preservation and for ensuring them to better grow and long term care rather than government funding. Art is generally developed through the skill of local populace and these adept person for any art may be obtained throught the preservation of their art. Any child could got interest on any field of art only after observing these natural art. Some time there isn’t possibility of managing and preserving art through only means of government funding. Government should adopt those strategy which incorporate locals in the process that is carried out for art which can grow them well.
However, In some cases certain arts could require government funding for the proper development. Without funding their growth couldn’t take as we expected. For example, sports require government funding for their infrastructure development, and for different exposure creating environment. Without helping from government fund these field of art couldn’t get attainable exposure and as a result of this proper flourish and development can’t possible.
Thus, In conclusion, there are many of forms of art. Some requires government funding for their betterment while in some, government funding leads to threatens the intregty of art instead of growing and flourishing it well. At last, We should consider and select different field of art based on whether it requires or don’t requires funding from government for it’s betterment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Government have responsibility for provi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... is major factor or field of any society .Some government believes that the growth...
^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...s major factor or field of any society .Some government believes that the growth of ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...unding may have positive effect and can brings positive changes towards society. Art m...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... support for their growth and flourish. however, some art requires only public particip...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...servation of their art. Any child could got interest on any field of art only after...
^^^
Line 7, column 659, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this strategy' or 'those strategies'?
Suggestion: this strategy; those strategies
...rnment funding. Government should adopt those strategy which incorporate locals in the process...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 151, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'threaten'.
Suggestion: threaten
...le in some, government funding leads to threatens the intregty of art instead of growing ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed on whether it requires or don't requires funding from government for it&...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51732101617 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85984052289 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464203233256 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 718.2 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1883146813 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.869565217 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8260869565 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21739130435 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391998680491 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137866463693 0.0831039109588 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079848913851 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276099915331 0.150359130593 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313290418967 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.