Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Nowadays the majority of people are aware of the precedence and magnitude of art in our lives since there have been an unprecedented growth of equanimity and insensibility in souls over the world and the art is one of the ways for expressing the current feelings and ideas. It should come no surprise that presence of society is impossible without such structure as government and its participation in daily routine of any community is inherent. Inevitably since the ancient times the considerable issue of its influence on us - not only common problems, but as well more grandiloquent and art-full aspects of lives - has been discussed a lot. While one may be absolutely convinced that funding by government is essential for art-flourishing, a number of recent published research papers concerning humanity history argue that there might be a deal of pitfalls.
Indeed, the briefest reflection of the recorded history reveals a blizzard of instances of oppression of arts from governance and quasi-governance structures. To illustrate the point, consider an Oscar nominee, the a dated and moving film named “A work without an author”. Meanwhile the three types of regimes – fascism, totalitarianism, capitalism- change each other, the person, artist soul is trying to find himself, realize his high-gifted ability to paint. Eventually, we all feel relieve since he has achieved it, but that aftermath sense of pressure which was in each regime are left with us. Despite of buttress in term of creating schools and work places for maintaining art, creativity as itself did not modify or alter in free stream.
In contrast to the previous paragraph, one might point up that were it for funding and supporting, artwork and creativity had not developed as they have by that moment. Throughout the history there have been always those who are constantly challenging the prevailing ideas of their times, the ideas supported by government. While these persons are prominent for us and creating, so is governance activity in creating places where the base of artwork and history of art are studied. Presumably, the deeper knowledge of the classic art and base, the higher possibility to give a birth to something breath-taking and unexpectable. Having put all ideas together, it can be estimated that both sides of this medal are d deserved to be taken into consideration.
In conclusion, it can be apprised that all ways of expression of art plays a significant role in developing us as a unique species since it evokes a lot of fresh ideas and support in especially in hard times. Given the human history in terms of total control, oppress from side of the government, there will be dreadful dissolution of society, however without its support in terms of disseminating info about art, creating art-schools for children etc. covering all slides of community might be less common. There is no need to retreat to Luddite attitude to any governance participation, rather than to take steps for finding a tradeoff and to embrace positive posture to innovation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...e the point, consider an Oscar nominee, the a dated and moving film named 'A wor...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... 'A work without an author'. Meanwhile the three types of regimes – fascism, t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 759, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...did not modify or alter in free stream. In contrast to the previous paragraph, o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: ALL_WAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'always'?
Suggestion: always
... In conclusion, it can be apprised that all ways of expression of art plays a significan...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2572.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15430861723 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05340426352 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587174348697 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8231373828 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.888888889 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7222222222 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256417012659 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749477365554 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529504984376 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158619116575 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324923017751 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 100.480337079 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.