Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you

Since time immemorial art has been an integral part of our society. The varied creativity of people results in distinctive forms of art. There are various forms of arts prevalent around the world. Different nations have different forms of arts and arts depict the culture of a nation. The various forms of art act as a mirror of the country's values and beliefs. Art is not dependent upon any other source for its existence. The only thing that an artist ever wishes for is his admirers who are the true source for his inspiration. In the present scenario government has taken due interest in protecting various forms of arts of a country. I believe that an artist does not need any sort of monetary support and hence an artist is capable of protecting his form of art. Therefore, government's funding of arts is unnecessary and it would certainly harm the integrity of any art form.

An artist only seeks admiration from public and the various forms of art came into existence without any monetary support but out of creativity. A dancer does not need funds to support his dance rather he needs admirers and followers who would take his legacy to another level and make it perfect in his art. Similarly, a sculptor is not dependent upon government's funds for his sculptures rather he would need students who would keep alive his art form. There are numerous examples from history which depict that the various art forms came into existence without any sort of funding. These art forms are till date followed by people. The great painter artist Leonardo de Vinci was not funded by any government for his art form but his admirers were the true source of his popularity. Art has been prevalent in our history without the support of funding from government.

Although art has always been there since the time humans have been there in this world. There are numerous art forms that are in existence without the support of the government. The government intervention in protecting certain art forms because those art forms were on the danger of extinction. The support from government has only helped in saving an art form and also it has aided artists to keep their art form alive. The various small scale industries are supported by government and pottery is one of them. The artisans are now provided funds by government to save their art form.

So to conclude the argument various art forms have been in existence on their own and without the support of the government. It is not important that art needs funding for its existence but when any form of art needs funds the support from government can always be asked for. The government should adopt measures to fund arts when it is needed. The government should also take steps to encourage young aspiring artists.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Since time immemorial art has been an integra...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d artists to keep their art form alive. The various small scale industries are supp...
^^^
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... government and pottery is one of them. The artisans are now provided funds by gove...
^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'therefore', 'sort of']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.301181102362 0.240241500013 125% => OK
Verbs: 0.147637795276 0.157235817809 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0787401574803 0.0880659088768 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0393700787402 0.0497285424764 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0531496062992 0.0444667217837 120% => OK
Prepositions: 0.147637795276 0.12292977631 120% => OK
Participles: 0.0393700787402 0.0406280797675 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.48455289366 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0137795275591 0.030933414821 45% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0984251968504 0.0997080785238 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0137795275591 0.0249443105267 55% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0137795275591 0.0148568991511 93% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2770.0 2732.02544248 101% => OK
No of words: 479.0 452.878318584 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78288100209 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.315240083507 0.366273622748 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.246346555324 0.280924506359 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.160751565762 0.200843997647 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.102296450939 0.132149295362 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48455289366 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.400835073069 0.48968727796 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.6793129816 55.4138127331 81% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6194690265 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.7407407407 23.380412469 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0830113286 59.4972553346 54% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.592592593 141.124799967 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7407407407 23.380412469 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.296296296296 0.674092028746 44% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 42.3753962731 51.4728631049 82% => OK
Elegance: 2.03278688525 1.64882698954 123% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439355253763 0.391690518653 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.139721207209 0.123202303941 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0867320534108 0.077325440228 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.496277365463 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.111292544666 0.149214159877 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180007360242 0.161403998019 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092282007271 0.0892212321368 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.517818303236 0.385218514788 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0414440307855 0.0692045440612 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343499489672 0.275328986314 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092678707895 0.0653680567796 142% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 15.0 7.22455752212 208% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 24.0 13.5995575221 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.