Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
According to Edgar Degas, “Art is not what you see, but what you make others see.” Art plays a vital role in determining the culture of society and improving the economy. The subject of government funding the arts is a debatable issue and extremely sensitive to the specifics of the country in mind.
First of all, art reflects the attitude of society in ways that another medium cannot capture. Art and craft are considered one of the essential factors in understanding society. For instance, in India, the city Jaipur is known for its artwork. It is also known by the name ‘Pink City’ because most of the buildings are painted pink. Pink city is famous for its vibrant art culture that varies from visual arts and crafts to dance, music, and architecture. This culture can be preserved if the government allocates necessary resources and looks after the maintenance of society.
Furthermore, arts help in generating revenue for the country in the form of tourism. Tourists are attracted to aesthetically pleasing places, and this helps in emerging small-scale businesses. These businesses will provide jobs for the people, and the economy of the country will rise. For example, in South India, most of the temples were built in the 10th Century. These temples have received many tourists from all over the world and have amassed much wealth. Small-time businesses like restaurants and florists have also flourished around the temples due to high tourist activity. What would happen if the government did not sustain these temples and finance them?
However, it would be foolish to fund art where there are more pressing needs to be addressed. The countries where art is abundant, but education and healthcare require more attention cannot focus on supporting art. For instance, some countries in Africa may have vibrant art, but the government cannot fund them because it needs to focus on more important issues at hand, which are healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Thus, the government must resolve the crucial issues first and then think about how they can support art.
In conclusion, it is vital to strike a balance, to ensure that arts flourish while preserving the economy. Calculated funds must be allocated to arts so that they can thrive and help in boosting the economy. At the same time, other pressing problems related to the development of the country must be kept in sight for a country to be prosperous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'art'.
Suggestion: art
.... Calculated funds must be allocated to arts so that they can thrive and help in boo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2042.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06699751861 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68921275267 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535980148883 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6653798492 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.8181818182 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3181818182 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354232479945 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10327725058 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788410850497 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209356869122 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843991662737 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.