Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Art is the journey of a free soul and the government gives wings to this free soul when it supports the artists with its funding. We are still a part of a society which undermines the effort it takes to take up the arts. Several artists have given up on their art because it has not been able to sustain their livelihood nor has it been able to give them a state of social respect in society. In such conditions, funding from the government would definitely be a boost for these artist to continue their profession as well as for newcomers to take up arts.
Society has always considered arts as a valueless profession while giving a god-like status to the sciences. The considerable amount of skills and the time taken to master these arts have never been taken into account by the people. Like it is said, ‘It’s easy to say, but difficult to do’, the years of hard work and toiling is the reason these artisans are what they are today. Technology has also played a principal role in uplifting and bringing down the arts. While technology has made the arts available for all, it also has caused enormous privacy violations like illegally downloadable music, photos and paintings.
Since the arts have been frowned upon, the payment for the art has always been the most important question. Artists, musicians, dancers, sculptors, to name a few, depend on the sale of their art for their livelihood. As a society which does not respect the art, sometimes the artist too, it is of no doubt that a fair monetary valuation for the art does not happen. Many artists have never been given their due because they simply never asked for it or they were easily manipulated. Harvey Ball, the man who gave the world the smiley, was paid a meager sum for his art. Non-payment of dues makes artists leave their trade and wander into some field which would help them make ends meet. Jobs are not readily available for artists like it happens in the field of science, because of which they move towards self-employment; very few of them succeeding from it.
For a community which has not been received well by society, government funding would mean adequate support and a huge spotlight to present their art. When a government agency spends money on a certain establishment, it draws a lot of attention to it, encouraging them to perform better. It not only boosts existing artists but also introduces newcomers to the art form. Development of museums and art centers for people to see the art and scholarships to deserving student’s acts as a push for the art. The funding would mean artist working harder to produce better art, thus getting a good source of income to support themselves.
In conclusion, funding from the government would mean a world of difference to the arts. As it creates more recognition, it will make society more accepting towards the arts, provide a stage for the artist to showcase his/her art, while earning a fair amount of money to support their art and their life.
- In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patrol man 60
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 474, Rule ID: THIS_NNS
Message: Did you mean 'this artist' or 'these artists'?
Suggestion: this artist; these artists
...ernment would definitely be a boost for these artist to continue their profession as well as...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, thus, well, while, as for, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2478.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73804971319 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56846626672 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491395793499 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2198951936 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.739130435 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7391304348 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82608695652 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284852338248 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925880354962 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696552524223 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179889597418 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701057471852 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.