“Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to revital the crutiality of art among people seems plausible. Art has a widespread history, and once it used to be very popular among peoples. Now a days, with busy and stressfull lifestyle, people have lost the importance of art in their life. It is of primary concern to revamp the importance of art once again in public.
Government funding certainly will help the artist to show case their talent in the public. It will aide an artist to come in the main light and flourish their work, moreover, it will also help artist economically. In such fast moving lifestyle, we hardly find time to laud the aesthetic beauty or hardly have any time to visit any art gallery. With certain allocation of money from government funding will definitely help artist to grow and also help in attracting more public to appreciate an artist work.
In addition, funding of art is necessary to encourage more people to manifest their work in public. Consequently, it will help in creating more awareness in the public and many people will come to know more about the integrity of the art.
The believe of other people that the government funding will threatens the integrity of the art seem tenuous. Instead of threatning, it will aggument the uprightness of the art. Allocating funds for art is very crutial now a days, because as with the development of technology, and with busy and stressfull lifestyle, we are forgetting the value and integrity of an art in our life. Funding art is a viable thing for government to do in order to restore the importance of art in public.
In conclusion, art has a very vast and antedevullian history and with time it seems it is slowly losing its place in common public. To restore the integrity of the arts, governmet should take proper steps. Funding art will definitely will encourage the artist to manifest their talent and will make art again widely popular among individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
... used to be very popular among peoples. Now a days, with busy and stressfull lifestyle, pe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...d to be very popular among peoples. Now a days, with busy and stressfull lifestyle, pe...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ore about the integrity of the art. The believe of other people that the government fun...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 5, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...about the integrity of the art. The believe of other people that the government fun...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'threaten'
Suggestion: threaten
...people that the government funding will threatens the integrity of the art seem tenuous. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...llocating funds for art is very crutial now a days, because as with the development of tec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...ating funds for art is very crutial now a days, because as with the development of tec...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84117647059 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68305589344 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423529411765 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1068948574 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.8235294118 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76470588235 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342891841035 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145321943159 0.0831039109588 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116990864697 0.0758088955206 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226558629312 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107703417531 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.