There is no doubt about the importance of art and impact of it to measure the culture flourish. That will sheds light on a question that has long instigated debate, that is, whether, government ought to fund the art to ensure more prosper and to be available for more people. Others claims funding art will threaten the integrity of it. However, from my point of view, I totally agree with the prior. To substantiate my case, the following paragraphs will illustrate my reasons and examples to elaborate my preference.
To begin with, the first and the foremost point coming to the mind is that the government funding will ensure harder and permanent working for all people due to availability of money. Moreover, people will be able to think in creative way to burgeon the art. For example, every year the Jordanian government full fund the top innovative art work. That will benefit both the owner of art and will lead to good country reputation.
Secondly, another vital point should be taken into consideration by funding the art will ensure tantamount of chances for all people tend to do art work. Furthermore, the government has all the access for any other fields, In other words, they have a concrete plan and know how to facilitate any art work. Hence, by comfort art environment people can work in easy way, and share their information and experiences without any limitations.
Thirdly, is not plausible to link art funding with its integrity, because the art is a personal expression, thought, imagination and might be the foreseen dreams for someone. Taking the government fund as a small investment will lead to bigger project that will benefit the economic status and thriving the owner. For instance, talented people with funding opportunities a great combination to success as the national talent programs.
All in all, due to aforementioned reasons, offering government found will be a great investment for the endless people powers and has a positive consequences on both people and government. Without any impact on the art integrity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the mind is that the government funding will ensure harder and permanent working...
^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple, every year the Jordanian government full fund the top innovative art work. ...
^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...government full fund the top innovative art work. That will benefit both the own...
^^
Line 10, column 146, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
...ndless people powers and has a positive consequences on both people and government. Without ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, no doubt, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 342.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07894736842 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79985227055 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538011695906 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0769628469 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.176470588 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 5.21951772744 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385970565244 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139648476987 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800284752665 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237175317148 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388119884772 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.