tpo 22
The lecture and the reading passage both discuss that Ethanol fuel, made from plants like corn, and some people claims it became alternative to gasoline in the United States. On one hand, the reading states that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons. On the other hand, the lecture refutes that by saying it is a good alternative, and unconvincing reasons.
To begin with, the reading states that increased use of ethanol will produce a lot of carbon dioxide, and will increase the global warming. However, the lecture argues that by saying that ethanol made from plant corns and this plant absorb carbon dioxide as a step of long process. And that lead to decrease it in the atmosphere.
Second, the reading makes argument by production of ethanol that lead to decrease amount of plants available for fuel or for animals. Conversely, the lecture refutes this claims by saying that producing ethanol come from parts pf plants contain cellulose and these parts are not favor for animals feeding.
Lastly, the reading claims that the ethanol price will never compete with gasoline. The lecture counter this by pointing out that increase production of ethanol will decrease the price of it, and will become available all the time. And the professor states that ethanol production 3 times the gasoline production that will drop the price of it to %30.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, lastly, second, so, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40973550611 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9657780408 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45958223555 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184652157721 0.0996497079465 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094614118368 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287775354993 0.162205337803 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316754018292 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.