tpo 18
The lecture and the reading passage both discuss a type of tree common in Florida, and started to die out. And Torreya trees will become extinct soon. On one hand, the reading mentions three possible solutions to prevent the trees decline. On the other hand, the lecture refutes the solutions in the reading passage.
First of all, the reading states that they have to grow these trees in their favorable climate in Northern Florida's because this region has wet and cool climate. However, the lecture argues that by saying this area has a dryer climate due to global worming so this lead to increase the temperature.
Secondly, the reading emphasize that they have to grow it far away from its Florida microclimate, and this process is called assisted migration. Conversely, the lecture makes argument by saying this idea is not good. And the professor said, they applied this idea in a type of trees is called black lockus and planted it in the north and the result was huge spreading that threatened the other species. So, the result was unpredictable out come.
Lastly, the reading claims that they have to move these trees from the wild life to closely monitored environment, that will help them to protect the species and conduct research on Torreya. In contrast, the lecture refutes this by pointing out that trees will not be able to resist any diseases when moving it, that will lead to further decline.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rst of all, the reading states that they have to grow these trees in their favor...
^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... all, the reading states that they have to grow these trees in their favorable c...
^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: OUT_COME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outcome'?
Suggestion: outcome
...ecies. So, the result was unpredictable out come. Lastly, the reading claims that the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87190082645 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36657117112 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.382633141 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243529814649 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929310635007 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792124166699 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146090865017 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546788218385 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.