Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write

Art has always been an integral part of any human society and thus making sure it flourishes and is available to all the members of the society is important. In today’s materialistic world it is mostly essential for the government to fund the arts to make sure it flourishes and is accessible to all.

Keeping aside the popular art forms like pop music or contemporary dance forms, not all the categories of art are widely popular. Despite of having thousands of varieties of art forms, there are only a few which are able to gather the attention of the masses and hence are capable of surviving without the need of any external help. But, there are art forms like caligraphy or embroidary which have not been able to accumulate a large number of enthusiasts, regardless how passionnate are some people about it. With the world changing and commertialisation being at its peak, our focus has shifted towards the profits. Since these art forms do not have a large number of followers, the financial return in these art forms are negligible as compared to the likes of pop music and contemporary dance forms. Hence, their existence is severely endangered and without external support, they might get extict in near future.

Now here comes the need of an external support. Even though it is not necessary that support has to come from only the government but it is highly unlikely, due to lack of significant funds, that a non-government organisation would be able to provide anything more than a negligible support. That is why the government should intervene and provide support to the otherwise neglected art forms. By advertising it, the government can ignite the appriciation of the same amongst the people. With funding, the museum tickets can be made cheaper to make the art acessible to all. By doing this, the artists can concentrate on their work rather than worrying about how to collect more funds which in turn will help them being intellectually more productive, specially the poor artists who otherwise are not able to create art.

Regardless of the benifits the arts can get from the governement funding, it the government is not impartial, the integrity of the art might get threathened. By promoting only certain art forms, the government might accelerate the rate of extention of the already endangered art forms. One more possibilty is that the governement might try to interfere in the creation process of an art form and there by threatening its integrity.

All in all, government support is essential in making sure that the art flourishes and is available to all the members of the society and it can do wonders, if the execution strategy is free of biasis and gives the artist their independence.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... which have not been able to accumulate a large number of enthusiasts, regardless how passionnate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...fits. Since these art forms do not have a large number of followers, the financial return in thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 715, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to be' or 'be'.
Suggestion: to be; be
...more funds which in turn will help them being intellectually more productive, special...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, then, thus, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93492407809 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86477976057 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477223427332 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4215049406 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.388888889 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6111111111 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.05555555556 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398875565301 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131673730758 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767712478901 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238775304786 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507933632469 0.0667264976115 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.