Goverment funding to the arts is might be helpful or increase more vulnerability in the domain can be decided based on the condition presented in different scenarios. The hyopthesis has not mentioned about any important details of the scenarios. Every domain need funnding in certain form to grow and explore new oppurtunities in the field. New horizons are developed when certain class of people invest time in understanding the subject more profoundly. The same is with arts. Arts as a dmoain had developed a lot in last couple of decades. New methods of paintin to modern dance culture. The more people invest time the more it grows.
Arts as a whole involves multifarious art forms, from dance to singign to painting. There are certain archaic arts forms that are loosing grip on the market. Although they are old they have a lot subtulties that are more not found in modern art form. To encourage people to pursure such art form we have to make the art form more lucrative and rewarding. As puplic funding in such cases has reduced to very negligilbe level funding source from other place should meet the existing demands. There funding from goverment and other sources becomes important. Sporadic funding in different forms such as concert, exhibition, training reimbursment etc. promotes participant in such atrs.
Goverment funding at many places are misued. Indian goverment allocates a lot of money for differnt purposes to people in different sector. The system inludes a lot nodes which maniplutaes funding at different level leading to ridiculous amount reaching to ground level. The concept of goverment funding makes the system create more vulnerable posotions. In situation such as India goverment funding of arts risks the integrity of arts.
Conclusively funding is necessary in many place but they way of implementation has to very strict. The larger and curropt the system the fewer benefits reaches to benefactors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ms that are loosing grip on the market. Although they are old they have a lot subtulties...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... art form more lucrative and rewarding. As puplic funding in such cases has reduce...
^^
Line 4, column 649, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Promotes
... exhibition, training reimbursment etc. promotes participant in such atrs. Goverment ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 38, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun place seems to be countable; consider using: 'many places'.
Suggestion: many places
... Conclusively funding is necessary in many place but they way of implementation has to v...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 315.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1873015873 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74938963427 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536507936508 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8507537613 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.0434782609 118.986275619 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.6956521739 23.4991977007 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.17391304348 5.21951772744 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254601401627 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721627371427 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626881482861 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141985267657 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561670747687 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.