Global climate change is one of the most serious problems threatening the environment and we cannot simply ignore it. Melting of glaciers and shifting of temperature to extremities is an example of this problem.The real dilemma lies in picking the right strategy to tackle this threat efficiently and appropriately.
Some people believe that the residents of the developed nations should lessen their energy consumption to mitigate the effects of climatic change. This would promote a more sustainable lifestyle reducing the burden on environment for providing the fuels and tolerating its deleterious consequences. This would lower the concentration of green house gases in the atmosphere, alleviating the present terrible condition.
In my opinion such a drastic change in lifestyle is somewhat unwarranted. The lack of concrete evidence stating that this would significantly mitigate the situation is a primary motivation for this thought. Instead of drastically changing the lifestyle by reducing the fuel consumption, more research and efforts should be aligned to find more permanent solutions for the problem. For example, replacing the conventional fuels with more cleaner alternatives would be a significant step towards the solution. Consider electric cars for an example, they tend to produce very less or no pollution as compared to the ones driven on gasoline. Moreover, the source of electricity could be a renewable source of energy like solar energy or wind energy.
Additionally, forcing people to reduce their energy consumption goes against fundamental liberties. One should be allowed to live lavishly, provided he is given suitable alternatives so that this does not have drastic impact on environment. The thought of reducing the consumption is somewhat regressive in nature and should not be adopted as humans have always rightly aimed for the development. More research to identify the factors causing climatic change would be helpful enabling us to come out with more better and effective solutions to the problem.
Thus in the conclusion, I believe such a change should not be expected from the residents, instead other effective alternatives should be explored and embraced to counter this threat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...tremities is an example of this problem.The real dilemma lies in picking the right ...
^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cleaner' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cleaner
..., replacing the conventional fuels with more cleaner alternatives would be a significant ste...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 506, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...be helpful enabling us to come out with more better and effective solutions to the problem....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...effective solutions to the problem. Thus in the conclusion, I believe such a cha...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223433242507 0.240241500013 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.177111716621 0.157235817809 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100817438692 0.0880659088768 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0681198910082 0.0497285424764 137% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0272479564033 0.0444667217837 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.103542234332 0.12292977631 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0708446866485 0.0406280797675 174% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04279863068 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0326975476839 0.030933414821 106% => OK
Particles: 0.00272479564033 0.0016655270985 164% => OK
Determiners: 0.122615803815 0.0997080785238 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0354223433243 0.0249443105267 142% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0148568991511 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2237.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 341.0 452.878318584 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.56011730205 6.0361032391 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.472140762463 0.366273622748 129% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.375366568915 0.280924506359 134% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.266862170088 0.200843997647 133% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.16715542522 0.132149295362 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04279863068 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 219.290929204 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571847507331 0.48968727796 117% => OK
Word variations: 63.7265318635 55.4138127331 115% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 21.3125 23.380412469 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2227381086 59.4972553346 52% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.8125 141.124799967 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 23.380412469 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.375 0.674092028746 56% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 58.8491568915 51.4728631049 114% => OK
Elegance: 1.46 1.64882698954 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353823410067 0.391690518653 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103670019285 0.123202303941 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0489297611148 0.077325440228 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.562320796749 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.187243645237 0.149214159877 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142475432833 0.161403998019 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570745364186 0.0892212321368 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.432755491633 0.385218514788 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0682911626466 0.0692045440612 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21918109121 0.275328986314 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588572455103 0.0653680567796 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.