The personal image of a political leader often helps him/her to rule his/her authority effectively. It is commonly agreed that being honest is vital for a political leader to be admired. A govenrnor who always tell lies is usually distrusted by the citizens and his/her power may collapsed easily. But to what extent of the issues that should the leaders should reveal to public is controversial. Some voices from society support that political leaders should withhold certain information to public in order to smooth his/her work, while others argue that our right to be fully informed should not be violated. Both opinions make a cogent case, but withholding certain insignificant piece of information may be more desirable in most occasions.
First of all, hiding unnecessary or less important details can relieve social confusions due to excess information. For instance, if the government is going to introduce a water cleaning technology, it does not have to publish all the technical details, as most of the citizens are layman to the field of chemistry and incognizant to the details. If all how the process proceed and what substances are used to neutralise the water, thosse excess information may distract public from understanding the fact the water quality is being improved. In addition, withholding information can avoid public panic caused by wrong interpretation of the misleading information. Let's say the food crops in Africa is hugely decreased owing to natural hazards and the leaders in United States announce this issue to their citizens with vast descriptions, the U.S. public may wrongly interpret that their nation is suffering from food crisis right now and will start panic and cause social unrest, but disregard the fact that they still have steady food supplies from internal agriculture and from other parts of world. Hiding certain information can effectively please the community.
Nonetheless, over-control in information disclose may hinder useful information to flow along different parties and thus harm the social well-beings. To prove this stance, the global coronavirus pandemic shows how Chinese authority conceals the outbreak of diesease and brings catatrosphic consequence to the globe. Public awareness in a community which without transparancy in information flow will be blocked and prompt counter-measures will not be able to implement if needed.
Indeed, although covering essential information may hinder public from knowing the truth, it may also help in shaping the polical leaders' image of power. When the amount of information release is controlled by the leaders, he/she often play the determining role in the society who is able to alter the public reactions towards a specific issue.
All in all, withholding information suitably can make the society operates more smooth. It is unarguably that the public right to be fully informed must not in infringed, but the political leaders should choose what to be revealed and how much to be disclosed wisely in order to achieve the greatest feedback.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 666, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...retation of the misleading information. Lets say the food crops in Africa is hugely ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'plays'.
Suggestion: plays
...controlled by the leaders, he/she often play the determining role in the society who...
^^^^
Line 9, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...order to achieve the greatest feedback.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2586.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36514522822 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90210625095 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533195020747 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 795.6 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.0596374279 60.3974514979 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.105263158 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3684210526 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392693080888 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117141528287 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880368803713 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222642691641 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700845879246 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.